An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Cognitive Empathy · Affective Empathy · Compassion · Emotional Contagion · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your empathy profile reveals a woman with profound emotional and relational gifts: you feel deeply, understand others well, and are motivated to help. These are genuine strengths that likely make you a trusted friend, a valued colleague, and a source of stability for those around you. However, the constellation of your scores—cognitive empathy at 60%, but affective empathy and emotional contagion both at 80%, with compassion at 60%—suggests a particular pattern: your heart and nervous system are more open to others' emotional worlds than your conscious mind can always process or your body can sustainably manage. In practical terms, you may often find yourself absorbing others' distress faster than you can understand it or choose how to respond to it.
At 36, navigating professional demands, relationships, and possibly family responsibilities, this pattern may be creating a subtle but significant drain on your wellbeing—not because empathy is bad, but because it lacks adequate containment. The good news is that all of these dimensions are developmentally responsive to practice. You are not 'too much' or 'too sensitive'; rather, your empathic gifts need intentional structures around them. The opportunity ahead is to build what we might call 'boundaried empathy'—the ability to remain deeply connected to others' experiences while maintaining a clear, protected sense of yourself. This is not about becoming less empathic; it is about becoming more skillful and sustainable in how you offer it.
Overall result
Good empathyYour answers suggest a high overall level of empathy, engaging in a relatively balanced way the different dimensions of this capacity: understanding others' mental states, affective resonance, and orientation toward support. This profile fosters rich relational bonds, quality communication, and an authentic presence with the people around you. Clinical psychology research associates this level with greater relational satisfaction and a social role that is often valued. It is nonetheless advisable to remain attentive to signs of empathic exhaustion or compassion fatigue, risks specific to this profile.
And if you have actual messages to decode, ScanMyLove analyses your conversations with your partner from a simple export and reveals their real dynamics.
Good empathy
4 dimensions to strengthen, 0 strength
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Ability to intellectually understand others' point of view, thoughts, and motivations.
Your answers suggest a well-developed cognitive empathy: you seem able to accurately model the mental states, intentions, and needs of those around you, even in complex situations. This skill, linked in clinical psychology research to better conflict-regulation abilities and more satisfying social relationships, is a genuine interpersonal asset.
It allows you to anticipate others' reactions and adapt your communication accordingly. It is worth ensuring that this cognitive acuity does not systematically outpace the other person's expression of their own feelings, leaving them the space to articulate things themselves.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Ability to feel others' emotions, to authentically share their emotional experience.
Your answers suggest a very high affective empathy: you seem to feel others' emotional states with great intensity, to the point that the emotions of the people around you can significantly influence your own inner state. This remarkable sensitivity fosters relational bonds of great depth and a rarely matched capacity for support.
However, clinical psychology research identifies at this level a substantial risk of compassion fatigue, chronic emotional overload, and difficulty distinguishing your own emotional needs from those of others. Protecting your inner balance then becomes a psychological health concern in its own right.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Motivation to act to relieve others' suffering, to transform empathy into benevolent action.
Your answers suggest a well-developed compassion: you seem naturally oriented toward support and help when you perceive suffering around you. This caring disposition is a powerful factor of social cohesion and relational quality.
Clinical psychology research emphasizes, however, that a high level of compassion without a parallel practice of self-compassion exposes you to a risk of gradual exhaustion, sometimes referred to as compassion fatigue. Taking care of yourself with the same kindness you offer to others is not a luxury, but a condition for the sustainability of your commitment to others.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Tendency to involuntarily absorb others' emotions, which can lead to emotional overload.
Your answers suggest a very high emotional contagion: the emotions of those around you seem to affect you intensely and quickly, to the point of significantly altering your own inner state. This emotional hyperpermeability can make certain social or professional situations particularly costly on the psychological level.
Clinical psychology research associates this level with a substantial risk of chronic emotional overload, regulation difficulties, and even confusion between self and other in emotional experience. Without suitable protective tools, this state can gradually impair your quality of life and your daily functioning.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
A clear reinforcement loop appears across your profile: high affective empathy and high emotional contagion form a paired strength that makes you exquisitely attuned to relational and environmental emotional climates. However, they also amplify each other's vulnerability—the faster you absorb emotions (contagion), the more fully you feel them (affective empathy), and the more responsible you may feel for alleviating them (compassion). Meanwhile, your cognitive empathy (60%), while solid, runs at a somewhat slower pace than your emotional absorption.
This creates a potential pattern: you may find yourself responding emotionally to situations, engaging with genuine care and effort, and only later reflecting on what was actually needed or what was within your scope. Recognizing this as a dynamic—not a flaw—is important. The inverse pattern (a 'circle of resource') is equally possible: as you develop clearer boundaries through the practices suggested, your cognitive empathy will become a more effective partner to your emotional attunement, allowing you to feel with others while understanding clearly where your responsibility begins and ends. This transformation requires consistent practice, but it is well within your reach.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — likely secure with affective sensitivity
Cognitive pattern — emotional reasoning
Cognitive pattern — catastrophizing through identification
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
There is a quiet architecture to how you relate to others, and at its heart lies a powerful, immediate resonance. Your very high scores in affective empathy and emotional contagion—both sitting at 80%—likely form the organizing core of your empathic style. Think of it as a radar that is always on, scanning the emotional environment before you have consciously decided to listen. Your cognitive empathy, which involves more deliberate perspective-taking, comes in at 60%: not low by any standard, but appearing here as a thoughtful, slightly slower companion that often arrives after you have already felt the feeling. Compassion, also at 60%, then channels that felt understanding into a desire to help, though it may sometimes be outpaced by the sheer volume of emotional data you absorb. This order—feeling first, then thinking, then acting—means that you are rarely disconnected from those around you; you are primed for attunement. But it also means that your nervous system frequently responds to others' states as if they were your own, perhaps even before you can name what is happening. This visceral immediacy makes you a refuge for many, yet it can leave you wondering where you end and the other begins.
This constellation creates a real double-edged gift. What it makes easy: you likely build trust and intimacy quickly, often intuitively sensing what a colleague, friend, or family member needs without them having to articulate it. You can read a room, soften tensions, and offer the kind of presence that makes people feel truly seen. These talents are not trivial—they are the glue of deep relationships and compassionate communities. What it makes costly: the emotional metabolism demanded by this style can be exhausting. You may find yourself drained after social gatherings even when you enjoyed them, burdened by sadness or anxiety that you later realize originated in someone else, or struggling to set boundaries without a nagging sense of guilt or discomfort. There can be a subtle but persistent fatigue, a sense that your empathic system is always running an open tab that no one else is paying. This is not a design flaw; it is the natural shadow of a capacity that was built to connect, not to protect.
How might such an empathic stance have taken root? Often, this kind of highly attuned, contagion-heavy empathy develops in contexts where emotional vigilance served a purpose. Perhaps in your early life, being keyed into a parent’s moods was a way to secure love or avoid conflict. Maybe you were the peacemaker among siblings, the one who smoothed things over by anticipating needs before they were spoken. It could also have been reinforced by praise—being told you were the 'sensitive' one, the caring daughter or friend—until the role became inseparable from your sense of self. These lessons put down deep neural pathways, teaching your brain and body that connection requires perpetual receptivity. At 36, you may carry those patterns into adult professional and personal landscapes that no longer demand such hypervigilance, yet the body doesn’t always get the memo. This history is not a sentence; it’s a story that has shaped you, and stories can be edited once we see them clearly.
In the midst of this, there is a resource that often gets overlooked: your compassion, which sits at a solid 60%. Compassion is the impulse to alleviate suffering, and it requires a subtle shift from simply feeling with someone to mobilizing in a way that is both caring and bounded. Even if it sometimes lags behind your emotional intake, its presence means you are not merely a passive sponge. You already possess the seed of a more deliberate empathy—one that can choose an action without drowning in affect. Similarly, your cognitive empathy, though not the headline act, is a capable ally that can be strengthened. It offers you the chance to label and contextualize emotions, to ask 'Whose feeling is this?' and 'What would be a proportionate response?' Think of these two dimensions as the scaffold that can hold your deep feeling without collapsing into it.
What might shift first, then, is not your sensitivity—because that sensitivity is a profound strength—but your relationship with it. The first movement could be impossibly small: a moment of pause. In a conversation, you notice a wave of heaviness and instead of inhaling it immediately, you take a breath and wonder, 'Is this mine?' That single act of curiosity, barely perceptible to others, begins to draw a distinction between empathy and fusion. A concrete sign that this shift is underway might be that you catch yourself feeling unexpectedly exhausted after a day and, rather than blaming yourself for being 'too much,' you trace the feeling back to a specific interaction where you absorbed something that wasn't yours. With that recognition, you might even feel a small release, as if you set down a backpack you didn't know you were carrying. Over time, that pause can become a gateway: your cognitive empathy steps in to offer perspective, your compassion chooses a response that honors your own limits, and your affective gifts remain generous but no longer on a constant drain. This is not about becoming less empathic; it is about becoming a more skillful steward of a powerful instrument, so that you can keep offering your warmth without losing your own inner fire.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Cognitive Empathy
Affective Empathy
Compassion
Emotional Contagion
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. When someone close to me is sad, I notice their sadness without feeling it myself.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. When I see someone in difficulty, the urge to help does not come to me spontaneously.
Answer : Sometimes
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. When someone tells me about their day with emotion, I listen without feeling it along with them.
Answer : Rarely
4. I find it hard to anticipate how others will react to a new situation.
Answer : Sometimes
5. When someone close to me cries in front of me, I am moved at a distance, without it gripping me.
Answer : Rarely
6. When I see someone in distress, I feel no particular need to act.
Answer : Sometimes
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page