An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Self-Sacrifice · Control · Low Self-Esteem · Blurred Boundaries · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile reflects a moderate-to-elevated pattern of codependent relating, with particular emphasis on control and boundary diffusion. At 36, you are navigating relational challenges that likely feel contradictory: you work hard to maintain and manage relationships (through both sacrifice and control), yet these very efforts may be creating distance or frustration. The pattern that emerges across your dimensions suggests a possible cycle: you experience anxiety or uncertainty, which activates a need to control outcomes; when that control feels threatened or insufficient, you may intensify your investment in the relationship (sacrifice, accommodation), which further blurs your boundaries and makes you dependent on the other person's behavior or mood for your sense of security.
This cycle is understandable—many people develop these patterns as learned strategies for safety, connection, or survival in earlier relationships—but it comes at a cost: you lose sight of yourself and become hostage to others' approval or reactions. The good news is that this profile is not fixed. Your moderate self-sacrifice score and moderate self-esteem suggest that you retain some capacity to prioritize yourself and to recognize your own worth; these are entry points for change. At your life stage, with professional and personal responsibilities likely in place, building clearer boundaries and reducing your need to control will likely free significant energy and emotional bandwidth. The work ahead is not about becoming less caring; it is about redirecting your care toward relationships that are reciprocal and toward yourself with the same investment you currently give to others.
Overall result
Moderate codependencyYour answers suggest certain codependent tendencies that could manifest particularly in your closest relationships. Clinically, this moderate profile indicates that patterns of self-erasure, need for approval, blurred boundaries, or benevolent control can activate situationally, without necessarily dominating all your interactions. These tendencies, although not severe, warrant attention because they can intensify under the effect of relational stress or in emotionally very charged relationships. Targeted self-awareness work may be enough at this stage to prevent a more marked evolution.
And if you have actual messages to decode, ScanMyLove analyses your conversations with your partner from a simple export and reveals their real dynamics.
Moderate codependency
4 dimensions to strengthen, 0 strength
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Tendency to sacrifice yourself for others, to ignore your own needs, and to place others' well-being before your own.
Your answers suggest a moderate tendency to put yourself aside for the benefit of others in certain relational situations. Clinically, this pattern may reflect a difficulty in legitimizing your own needs, sometimes associated with an implicit belief that taking care of yourself would be selfish.
These episodes of self-sacrifice, although occasional, can generate cumulative emotional fatigue and fuel a sense of unexpressed frustration. Recognized approaches such as CBT emphasize the importance of identifying these moments of withdrawal in order to gradually re-educate the relationship with yourself and strengthen your ability to voice your needs.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Need to control situations and people, often under the guise of help or benevolence.
Your answers suggest a high need to control people and situations, one that goes beyond the framework of ordinary help. Clinically, this functioning often masks deep anxiety: control becomes a coping mechanism in the face of a sense of inner insecurity or a fear that things will "go off the rails" if you do not supervise them.
This pattern can generate tension in your relationships, as others may sense an invisible pressure or a questioning of their competence. Recognized approaches such as CBT offer effective tools to work on the underlying anxiety and develop a better tolerance for the unexpected.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Feeling of lacking personal worth, depending on others' validation to feel worthy.
Your answers suggest a self-esteem that is at times fragile, particularly in certain relational contexts or under the effect of others' gaze. Clinically, this moderate instability may manifest as recurring doubts about your legitimacy, heightened sensitivity to criticism, or a tendency to downplay your successes.
These fluctuations do not reflect a fundamentally deficient self-esteem, but indicate zones of vulnerability that can be activated by specific interactions. Recognized approaches such as CBT offer effective tools to identify the automatic thoughts that fuel these vulnerabilities and to gradually strengthen the foundation of your personal self-esteem.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Difficulty setting and maintaining healthy boundaries, distinguishing your emotions from those of others.
Your answers suggest significantly blurred relational boundaries, with a marked tendency to lose yourself in the needs, emotions, or expectations of others. Clinically, this functioning may result from a relational history in which setting boundaries was perceived as dangerous or a source of rejection, creating a pattern of defensive permeability.
At this level, the difficulty in differentiating from the other often generates confusion between self and other, making it hard to identify your own emotions or desires. This can sustain unbalanced relational dynamics and a chronic, poorly acknowledged suffering.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Two dimensions in your profile—Control (60%) and Blurred Boundaries (60%)—are elevated together, and they reinforce each other in a pattern worth understanding. When boundaries are blurred, you become hyperresponsive to others' needs and emotions; this heightened sensitivity then activates your need to manage or control outcomes, both to reduce your own anxiety and to try to secure the stability or approval you unconsciously seek from the other person. Conversely, your attempts to control create friction, which threatens the connection you fear losing, which drives you to accommodate more (blurring boundaries further) to repair or maintain the relationship. This is a classic codependent loop: control + enmeshment reinforce each other.
Breaking this cycle requires work on both dimensions: learning to tolerate the anxiety that comes with relinquishing control, and simultaneously building the self-awareness and skill to maintain clearer emotional and behavioral boundaries. Your moderate self-sacrifice and moderate self-esteem complicate but do not contradict this pattern; they suggest that you are not uniformly self-abandoning, but rather oscillate between accommodation and control attempts depending on the relationship context or threat level. This intermittent pattern can be harder to recognize and change than a more consistent one, because the variability makes it harder to link cause and effect in your own mind.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — anxious
Cognitive pattern — catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — all-or-nothing thinking
Early schema — defectiveness (shame)
Early schema — subjugation
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Recognised couple/relationship frameworks applied to the relationship you described — as hypotheses to test against your experience, never as conclusions about the other person.
Adult attachment
Your profile is at times suggestive of an anxious attachment style, in which the fear of abandonment or rejection can lead you to over-invest in the relationship and to neglect your own needs. It may be that you try to maintain closeness through heightened vigilance towards the other person or through constant adjustment to his expectations — is this a dynamic you recognize in your relationship?
Sources: Hazan & Shaver (1987) ; Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991)
Nonviolent Communication (Rosenberg)
With a high score on control and on blurred boundaries, it may be that you find it hard to express your personal needs without fearing disapproval, or that you frame your requests as indirect reproach rather than as a clear request. This difficulty in communicating "what I feel, what I need" could reinforce a cycle in which your real needs remain invisible.
Sources: Rosenberg (2003)
Triangular theory of love (Sternberg)
It may be that your relationship is characterized by an imbalance: strong intimacy and passion, but with a commitment tinged with a form of control or of self-sacrifice in order to preserve the bond. This configuration is at times suggestive of a fragile love triangle in which you carry more of the emotional weight — do you recognize this asymmetry?
Sources: Sternberg (1986)
Drama triangle (Karpman)
Your profile suggests that you might alternate between the role of Victim (sacrificing yourself, complaining about not being appreciated) and that of Rescuer (taking care of the other person, ignoring your own needs). It may be that this swinging back and forth exhausts you without resolving the real relational problems — is this a shift you observe in yourself?
Sources: Karpman (1968)
FIRO (Schutz)
With blurred boundaries and a high need for control, it may be that you are seeking strong emotional inclusion while at the same time trying to master the dynamic in order to feel safe. This conflict between the wish for fusion and the need for control can create an internal and relational tension — is this consistent with what you are experiencing?
Sources: Schutz (1958)
The Gottman model
In the long run, codependency can feed criticism (an indirect reproach about not being loved as you would wish) or a defensive stance. It may be that you try to compensate through relational effort, but without clearly expressing what hurts you — this lack of reciprocity in expressing needs can reverse the positive/negative ratio.
Sources: Gottman (1999) ; Gottman & Silver (1999)
The five love languages (Chapman)
It may be that you express your love in one or two dominant languages (for example, acts of service or quality time) without receiving anything back in your own language. This mismatch in love languages often reinforces the feeling of one-sided sacrifice — have you been able to identify how each of you actually loves?
Sources: Chapman (1992) — proposed/debated theory
Your profile tells a story of a person who, somewhere along the line, learned that safety and love depend on how well you can read and manage the emotional climate around you. The high Control score seems to be the organizing force, not because you seek power, but because you crave predictability and reassurance that you won’t be abandoned or rejected. When boundaries are blurred—as they are here—it becomes hard to know where your own feelings end and someone else’s begin, so the urge to steer outcomes feels like a lifeline. Your moderate Self-Sacrifice fits right into this: you give, accommodate, and bend, hoping that your efforts will guarantee connection and stability. Underneath, the moderate Low Self-Esteem whispers that you might not be enough just as you are, so you double down on controlling and self-giving to prove your worth. This isn’t a flaw; it’s a brilliant survival blueprint that once kept you afloat in choppy emotional waters.
Yet this architecture creates a powerful internal tug-of-war. On one side, it makes you exquisitely attuned, generous, and responsible—you probably notice needs before they’re spoken, and your care is a genuine gift. On the other side, you rarely rest fully. Your inner calm depends on other people’s stability, which is ultimately beyond your command. The more you manage, the more drained and resentful you might become, and the very people you try to hold close may feel an invisible net—cared for but also subtly smothered. The tension is this: your deep desire for connection gets hijacked by anxiety, turning love into a management project that costs you your own equilibrium.
How did this make sense? Picture a younger you in an environment where a parent’s mood could darken the whole house, or where love had to be earned by being the peacemaker, the “easy” child, the emotional sponge. You learned to scan faces, tones, and silences, and to adjust your behavior to keep the peace. That honed a near-magical radar for others’ states, but it also taught you that your own needs were secondary to theirs. Over time, you blurred into other people’s lives because being essential felt safer than being separate. This wasn’t weakness; it was an intelligent adaptation that helped you navigate a world where connection felt conditional. The trouble now is that the old blueprint still runs automatically, even when the scenery has changed.
Inside this profile hides an underappreciated resource: your moderate scores in self-sacrifice and self-esteem are not extreme. That tells me a part of you still resists total self-loss, still holds back a sliver of space for yourself, still senses you deserve something more. That faint inner boundary is a seed. And the very fact that you are here, examining these patterns, means you possess an observing self that can watch the impulse to control without immediately acting on it. That reflective capacity is the engine of change—it is not your patterns, but the part that can notice them, and that is where freedom begins.
The first shift is likely to be small and quiet. It might look like pausing for three seconds before you leap in to fix a friend’s problem. Or noticing the flutter of anxiety when your partner is upset, and instead of rushing to soothe, you simply say, “I’m here to listen.” The concrete sign that something is moving will not be a dramatic transformation but a moment when you feel that familiar tension and let it be, without translating it into action. You’ll discover that the sky doesn’t fall when you allow others to carry their own discomfort—in fact, you might breathe a little easier. These micro-choices, repeated over time, rewire the old assumption that you are responsible for everyone’s well-being. You are allowed to be a person, not a project manager of emotions. Hope lies not in becoming someone different, but in remembering that you are already more than your relational patterns—and you can learn to trust again, starting with yourself.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Self-Sacrifice
Control
Low Self-Esteem
Blurred Boundaries
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I know how to protect my own needs, even when others are counting on me.
Answer : Often
You answered "Often". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I feel guilty when I take time for myself.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I know how to say no when I am tired or worn out.
Answer : Often
4. I feel responsible for my partner's happiness.
Answer : Rarely
5. I neglect my own health to take care of others.
Answer : Rarely
6. I turn down situations that make me suffer, even at the risk of disappointing others.
Answer : Often
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page