An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Compulsive Use · Withdrawal · Social Impact · Loss of Control · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall moderate global score masks a more nuanced and clinically meaningful profile: while compulsive checking behaviors remain manageable, you are experiencing significant difficulty with loss of control and marked withdrawal symptoms when disconnected from screens. This pattern suggests a screen dependency that is no longer a simple habit but has developed physiological and emotional dimensions—your nervous system has become conditioned to rely on screens for emotional regulation, making disconnection genuinely distressing. The moderate social impact score should be interpreted with caution: it may indicate that outward damage is limited, but given your high loss of control and withdrawal scores, there is risk that the relational and professional costs are being underestimated or minimized.
At 36, navigating professional and possibly family responsibilities, screens may have become an increasingly primary tool for stress management and emotional escape, which paradoxically deepens the dependency cycle. The encouraging aspect of your profile is that you retain awareness of the problem—you recognize the loss of control and the distress of withdrawal—which is essential for change. However, this awareness combined with apparent difficulty in sustaining change suggests that self-directed strategies alone may be insufficient; external supports and structured intervention are likely to be more effective than relying on willpower or insight alone. Your profile indicates you are at a juncture where intervention could prevent further escalation into more severe dependency.
Overall result
ModerateYour answers suggest that your screen use shows some early signs evoking an emerging dependence, which deserve conscious attention without being alarming. Clinically, this moderate profile indicates the partial presence of certain mechanisms characteristic of behavioral addictions — automaticity of use, mild discomfort during disconnection, occasional encroachment on other activities — without the full clinical picture being established. Clinical psychology research shows that this stage is the one where preventive behavioral interventions are most effective, before the reinforcement circuits consolidate further and make change more costly.
Moderate
4 dimensions to strengthen
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Tendency to use screens automatically and repetitively
Your answers suggest a tendency to check your screens automatically, without a clearly formulated intention beforehand. Clinically, this mechanism reflects a partial activation of dopaminergic reinforcement circuits: the act of checking becomes a conditioned reflex, triggered by internal signals such as boredom or mild discomfort, or external ones such as notifications.
Recognized approaches such as CBT point out that this stage, although not pathological, is an entry point toward more rigid patterns if no regulation is introduced. Greater awareness of your personal triggers is the most effective intervention lever at this level.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Symptoms of discomfort or anxiety when deprived of screens
Your answers suggest the presence of significant withdrawal symptoms when moving away from your screens: anxiety, irritability, restlessness or difficulty concentrating. Clinically, these manifestations reflect a significant neurobiological adaptation, in which the nervous system has integrated digital stimulation as a primary emotional regulator.
In its absence, the brain signals an imbalance through these physical and emotional symptoms. Recognized approaches such as CBT describe this mechanism as characteristic of established behavioral addictions. Without intervention, tolerance to the lack tends to decrease gradually, making disconnection periods increasingly hard to endure and to initiate.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Consequences of screen use on your relationships and social activities
Your answers suggest that your screens are beginning to encroach on certain aspects of your social or professional life, in a perceptible but not yet dominant way. Clinically, this stage corresponds to what clinical psychology research describes as partial functional impact: some interactions are cut short, some commitments deferred or neglected in favor of screen time, without this yet constituting a deep disorganization of your life.
This level of impact deserves conscious attention because the negative effects on relational quality tend to amplify gradually when no regulation is introduced, following a mechanism of gradual erosion of real social bonds.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Difficulty limiting or stopping screen use despite wanting to
Your answers suggest a significant loss of control over your screen consumption: your intentions to stop or limit yourself are regularly overwhelmed by actual behavior. Clinically, this profile reflects a marked alteration of the prefrontal inhibitory control mechanisms, characteristic of behavioral addictions according to DSM-5-type reference criteria.
The brain has gradually learned to bypass conscious decisions to stop in favor of immediate reward signals. At this level, pure self-control strategies reach their structural limits, and behavioral approaches alone, without structured external support, show reduced effectiveness over time.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
A critical pattern emerges from the relationship between your high withdrawal score and your high loss of control score: these dimensions reinforce each other in a feedback loop. Loss of control leads to continued and often escalating screen usage, which in turn strengthens the neurobiological and emotional dependence on screens. When you then attempt to disconnect—whether intentionally or circumstantially—you encounter significant withdrawal symptoms (anxiety, irritability, restlessness), which creates an aversive experience that reinforces the impulse to return to screens for relief. This cycle can become self-perpetuating: the more you struggle to control usage, the more distressed you become during withdrawal, and the more powerfully screens are reinforced as the solution to that distress.
Additionally, both loss of control and withdrawal appear to coexist with only moderate compulsive checking, suggesting that the problem is not primarily about the frequency of automatic behaviors, but about the difficulty in sustaining discontinuation and the aversive state that discontinuation produces. This distinction is clinically important: it suggests that interventions focusing solely on reducing checking frequency (habit reversal) are unlikely to be sufficient, and that addressing the underlying emotional and physiological dependence (through withdrawal management, alternative coping strategies, and possibly professional support) will be more effective.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — Sympathetic/Mobilization with dorsal tendencies
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — All-or-nothing thinking
Early schema — Insufficient Self-Control
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Addictions and dependencies
Biopsychosocial model (Griffiths)
Sources: Griffiths (2005)
Relapse prevention (Marlatt)
Sources: Marlatt & Gordon (1985)
Operant reinforcement
Sources: Skinner (1953)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Emotional regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Your screen use tells a story of a nervous system that has learned to find safety and regulation in the glow of a device, and that now struggles to function without it. The high scores on loss of control and withdrawal are not two separate problems—they are the two sides of a single internal pattern: once you are engaged, something in you keeps going past the point you intended, and when you eventually pull away, your body and mind protest as if deprived of something essential. The relatively lower compulsive use score suggests that you do not necessarily feel an overpowering urge to pick up your phone or open your laptop in every idle moment; you can often resist the initial impulse. But the moment you give yourself permission to use—perhaps promising it will be brief—the grip tightens, and the exit becomes diffuse and difficult. This is less about craving and more about an inability to stop once the interaction has begun, coupled with a genuine distress when the interaction ends. Together, they create a cycle that feels less like a classic addiction and more like a reliance on screens as a prosthetic for emotional balance.
This configuration brings a sharp internal tension. On one hand, screens likely offer you a highly effective, always-available way to manage stress, boredom, or uncomfortable feelings. They might be your primary tool for switching off after a demanding day, for staying connected to others, or for keeping your mind occupied when it would otherwise spiral. This makes daily life smoother and provides reliable relief. On the other hand, this very effectiveness has made them indispensable, and now the cost is a profound loss of autonomy. You can no longer choose to disconnect without paying a price in the form of agitation, restlessness, or a hollow sense of missing something. What was once a choice has hardened into a necessity, and that loss of freedom may weigh on you more heavily than you openly admit. The moderate social impact score hints that you have managed to keep the external damage in check—perhaps your relationships and work are still holding up—but the internal toll, the quiet sense that you are not fully in command, is likely the deeper wound.
How might this have come to be? Such patterns rarely emerge from a vacuum. Perhaps at a time of heightened demand—a period of intense professional pressure, a shift to remote work, a season of caregiving, or a stretch of emotional isolation—screens became the most reliable thread to hold things together. They allowed you to remain functional, to stay afloat when other sources of rest or connection were scarce. Your nervous system, which is always learning what brings relief, took note: this works. Over time, it began to anticipate that relief and to sound an alarm when it was removed. The withdrawal you now feel when disconnected is not a sign of weakness or failure; it is a biological signal that your body has adapted to a consistent source of stimulation. It expects the screen to be there, and when it is not, it floods you with discomfort to motivate you to return. In this light, your current profile might be seen as the ghost of an old survival strategy—one that served you when other resources were stretched thin, but that has outlived its context.
An underappreciated resource in your profile is the very awareness that these scores reflect. You recognize that you lose control; you feel the withdrawal acutely. This is not simply suffering—it is a powerful internal alarm system that remains intact. Many people in similar patterns numb themselves so thoroughly that they lose touch with the distress altogether. Your discomfort is a signal that some part of you still yearns for a different way of being, and that part is not yet silenced. It may feel like a burden, but it is also your compass. Additionally, the moderate compulsive use score suggests you have not yet lost the battle at the very start of the chain; you still have some decision space before you engage. That threshold—the moment before you start—is a precious opening that can be cultivated, even if right now it feels tiny and unreliable.
If something were to shift first, it might not be a dramatic overhaul of your screen habits, but a softening of the withdrawal distress. Change could begin with a gentle, almost experimental curiosity: what happens if I wait just two minutes before picking up my phone? Not as a rule, but as an inquiry. The first sign that something is moving might be a subtle shift in your inner narrative when you feel that familiar prickle of discomfort. Instead of thinking, “I need to go back, I can’t stand this,” you might notice a thought like, “This is unpleasant, but it’s just a sensation; it will pass.” That small crack of perspective—the ability to observe the withdrawal rather than be swallowed by it—is often the very beginning of reclaiming agency. It need not happen in grand gestures; a single moment of staying with the unease without reaching for the screen, and finding the world did not collapse, can be profoundly instructive for the nervous system. You are not dismantling a fortress, but letting a window open where before there was only a wall.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Compulsive Use
Withdrawal
Social Impact
Loss of Control
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I check my phone as soon as I wake up, before even getting out of bed.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I check my phone automatically, for no particular reason.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I spend more time on screens than I had planned.
Answer : Rarely
4. I use screens during meals with family or friends.
Answer : Rarely
5. I have trouble falling asleep because I use screens in bed.
Answer : Rarely
6. I keep a screen on at all times, even when I am not actively using it.
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page