An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Video Games · Online Shopping · Content · Communication · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile suggests a relationship with the digital world that is mostly well-regulated, but with two fronts—online shopping and messaging—where you sometimes exceed your own comfort zone. These tendencies remain at a moderate level and do not appear to disrupt your professional or personal life in a major way, yet they are notable enough to deserve your attention before they could gradually intensify. In contrast, your use of video games and your consumption of online content are models of control, which demonstrates that you already possess effective self-regulation skills when the stakes feel right for you. As a 36-year-old woman, you likely juggle multiple roles and responsibilities, and these digital outlets may serve as a quick mental escape or a means of staying connected; the challenge is to ensure they remain tools that serve you rather than habits that quietly take the lead. Your current readiness to change is low, which is a completely normal and valid position—it simply means that you are not yet feeling a pressing need to act. The fact that you have taken the time to complete this test, however, suggests an underlying spark of curiosity, and even small, observational steps can gently amplify that spark over time. Remember, this report offers a snapshot based on your self-assessment, not a clinical judgment; it is an invitation to reflect, not a prescription.
It's possible that your moderate online shopping and communication habits serve as a way to manage a deep-seated sense of vulnerability, especially when face-to-face situations trigger fears that feel overwhelming. This pattern may be fueled by a tendency to catastrophize perceived threats or to trust anxious feelings as proof of danger, keeping your nervous system in a state of high alert. Recognizing this connection could be a gentle first step toward exploring, at your own pace, new ways to feel safe and in control.
Overall result
ModerateYour responses suggest moderate signs of internet dependence in certain specific areas of your digital use. Clinically, this level corresponds to a phase of vulnerability in which excessive-use behaviors begin to settle in without yet having generated major repercussions on overall functioning. The mechanisms at play, such as variable reward, fear of missing information, and emotional regulation through the digital realm, are identified in clinical psychology research as important vectors of progression toward more problematic use. Attention and a few targeted adjustments can effectively reverse this tendency.
Moderate
3 dimensions to strengthen, 2 strengths
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Your responses suggest a recreational relationship with video games that is well integrated into your daily life. You seem able to start and stop a session without particular tension, and gaming does not encroach on your obligations or relationships. Clinically, this so-called controlled use is characterized by the absence of increasing tolerance, of intrusive thoughts about gaming, and of negative reactions when stopping. Here, gaming serves a function of relaxation or socializing without generating functional disruption, which corresponds to healthy digital use according to recognized clinical frameworks.
According to your results, video games appear to be an activity that you fully control, and which does not create any interference in your obligations or your relationships. This healthy balance is a valuable asset, especially in a context where other digital uses, such as online shopping and messaging, sometimes exceed your intentions.
The psychological mechanism at play here seems to be one of deliberate, non-compulsive use: you likely choose your gaming moments intentionally, which protects you from the drift toward automatic behaviors. This is a positive resource that you could lean on when considering your other digital habits, as it shows you already have strong self-regulation skills in this domain. If you ever notice your gaming time increasing in response to stress, a brief self-check will be enough to maintain this balance.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your responses suggest an occasional tendency toward impulsive online buying, in a context that remains manageable but warrants heightened vigilance. Clinically, impulsive online purchases are partly explained by the deliberately persuasive architecture of commercial platforms, such as one-click payment, saved accounts, and personalized notifications, which short-circuit conscious deliberation. The boundary between pleasure buying and compulsive buying is gradual: one often finds a sense of tension preceding the purchase and fleeting relief followed by slight guilt, without major financial repercussions at this stage.
One notable observation is that your online purchases seem punctuated by moments where the urge takes you somewhat by surprise, even though you manage to keep the consequences under control. What your results highlight is a fine line between a simple pleasure purchase and a compulsive buy; the fact that your communication habits are also slightly excessive suggests that rapid, one-tap interactions on your phone could foster a climate of impulsivity that extends to shopping.
This does not yet translate into significant financial or emotional difficulties, but if the pattern intensifies, the relief that often follows an impulsive purchase could become a conditioned response to a negative emotion—something worth monitoring. It can be useful to think of the platforms you visit as being designed to trigger just this type of behavior, which means that resisting them on occasion requires an active decision on your part, rather than simple willpower. You remain the best judge of whether these buying episodes truly bring you satisfaction or whether they leave you with a slight sense of guilt.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your responses suggest a controlled and intentionally chosen consumption of online content. You seem able to disconnect without particular tension and to actively choose what you consume rather than passively following algorithmic recommendations. Clinically, this healthy use is characterized by the absence of compulsive scrolling, of a sense of deprivation when disconnecting, and of valued activities being replaced by passive consumption. Here, the digital realm serves a function of occasional information or entertainment without impairing sleep quality or relational availability toward others.
Your relationship with online content—whether it's streaming, browsing, or watching—is one you seem to navigate with ease and without a sense of obligation. This stands out positively in your overall profile, because the moderate scores in shopping and communication suggest a certain susceptibility to digital signals elsewhere, yet here you remain the one in charge. There may be a protective psychological mechanism at work: you appear to approach content with a clear selection rather than letting yourself be sucked in by endless scrolling, which likely protects your attention span and your sleep.
Given your age, the demands of a career and perhaps a family life naturally make time a precious resource, and you seem to use it thoughtfully in this area. It could be interesting to examine what makes this area so controlled compared to the others—perhaps you simply have less of an emotional attachment to content, or you have successfully built a set of habits that keep it in check.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your responses suggest that the time spent on messaging apps and social networks is slightly excessive relative to your intentions, without the situation being genuinely problematic yet. Clinically, this level corresponds to the appearance of reactivity to notifications, mild anxiety when an expected reply is absent, and a tendency to check messages reflexively rather than deliberately. These automatic behaviors settle in gradually through conditioning mechanisms: the smartphone becomes an object of compulsive checking whose frequency increases gradually, often without the person being fully aware of it.
Messaging and social media appear to occupy a slightly larger place in your daily life than you would ideally choose, forming a pattern of notification-driven reactivity that can fragment your attention. At a level such as yours, one often sees the emergence of an automatic reflex: your hand reaching for the phone the moment a vibration or a screen flash is detected, even when you are engaged in something meaningful.
This is not surprising—these applications are engineered to capture just that reaction—but it can create a mental background noise that slowly chips away at your ability to be present with colleagues, friends, or yourself. In your broader profile, this moderate score pairs with a similar tendency in online shopping, which hints at a shared pattern of impulsive digital actions that bypass your more deliberative, reflective side. If at times you feel a slight anxiety when a message goes unanswered for too long, know that this is a common and reversible conditioning effect, not a character flaw.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
These questions measure your readiness to change. Your score suggests you are not yet fully convinced of the need to evolve — a valid stage of the process. Awareness always comes before decision. Your report helps clarify what is at stake.
Your score on the readiness-to-change scale indicates that, at this moment, you perceive little necessity to modify your digital habits, a state that public health models refer to as the pre-contemplation stage. Far from being a weakness, this honest starting point is actually the foundation from which authentic change can emerge, once you have accumulated enough personal reasons to do so.
With moderate scores in shopping and communication, the impact on your daily life may feel too mild or subtle to justify a real effort, and you are the only one who can decide when the costs outweigh the benefits. Reading this report is in itself a step in the direction of curiosity, and it might plant a seed that will grow at its own pace. There is no pressure to act now; simply continuing to notice, without judgment, the moments when your digital habits leave you with a slight sense of fatigue, lost time, or social disconnection can gradually shift your internal balance.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your profile presents an interesting interplay between the two moderate dimensions and the ones that are firmly under control. The shared pattern between online shopping and communication suggests that rapid, low-friction interactions on your smartphone may be creating an environment where impulsive decisions become more likely across different activities. Notifications, whether from a messaging app or a flash sale, activate a similar neural reward circuit, and frequent exposure can condition your brain to seek out these micro-rewards more reflexively.
At the same time, your solid command of video games and content consumption may be protecting you from a more generalized drift, because these areas do not reinforce the impulsive loop and instead allow for intentional engagement. The low readiness to change could be both a cause and a consequence of this balance: because the overall picture is not yet problematic, your motivation to tweak anything remains understandably low. If you were to address one of the moderate areas, there is a good chance that the skills you learn would seamlessly transfer to the other, creating a virtuous cycle of increased self-awareness and intentionality. In a way, your strengths in gaming and content are a built-in scaffold that can support you should you ever decide to experiment with new habits.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — Sympathetic (mobilization)
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — Emotional Reasoning
Cognitive pattern — All-or-Nothing Thinking
Early schema — Vulnerability to Harm or Illness
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Addictions and dependencies
Biopsychosocial Model (Griffiths)
Sources: Griffiths (2005)
Relapse Prevention (Marlatt)
Sources: Marlatt & Gordon (1985)
Operant conditioning
Sources: Skinner (1953)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Ellis’s ABC Model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Looking across your results, what stands out is not a single dominating habit but a pattern of balance and selectivity. Your two moderate scores—online shopping and communication—seem to act as the emotional outlets in your digital life, while video games and streaming remain firmly in the background, almost untouched by compulsion. This suggests that your relationship with screens is organized more by the psychological function each activity serves than by any general loss of control. Shopping and messaging likely offer you quick, reliable forms of gratification: one tied to autonomy and pleasure (the thrill of choice, the anticipation of a package), the other to relational closeness and information (staying in the loop, feeling connected). In contrast, gaming and passive content, which require a different kind of immersion or time investment, don’t call to you in the same way. That distinction is key. You are not a person who gets pulled into everything digital; you have clear preferences, and your mind seems to have drawn a line, even if you haven’t consciously planned it. Your overall moderate score, then, reflects not a diffuse problem but two specific, moderate-intensity currents that flow in an otherwise calm river.
The internal tension this configuration creates is subtle but real. On the one hand, these two activities probably make your life easier: online shopping can be a mini-escape from the demands of work, family, or the mental load that many 36-year-old women carry; messaging apps can keep loneliness at bay and provide a sense of shared identity. They serve you, often in moments when you have no other quick recharge. On the other hand, the very ease of these outlets can become a quiet cost. You might notice a slight clench of guilt after a late-night browsing session, or a flicker of irritation when you realize you’ve again fallen into a messaging loop instead of doing something you actually wanted to do. The tension isn’t a crisis; it’s more like a background hum: the knowledge that these habits, while not harmful yet, sit just across the line of your own comfort, and they could, under the right stress, drift further. Your low readiness to change adds another layer: you’re not in a rush to fix anything because the price isn’t high enough, and that makes perfect sense. But the very fact you’re reading this suggests there’s a quiet voice asking, “Is this quite right?” That voice is the beginning of something.
A plausible backstory for this equilibrium points to its functionality. Picture yourself navigating the past few years—perhaps a period of heightened responsibility, social disruption, or personal transitions. In such a context, online shopping may have emerged as a reliable, instantly available reward when other forms of leisure (a spontaneous coffee with a friend, a walk without an agenda) were harder to access. It’s a form of self-care that asks little of you but gives a small dopamine lift, and it’s entirely legal, socially normal, and even celebrated in certain circles. Meanwhile, messaging may have become your social lifeline, a way to maintain friendships and family ties when time and energy for deeper, longer interactions were scarce. The fact that you never slid into problematic gaming or endless video watching tells me that you already have a strong internal filter; you’re not escaping into any portal, only the ones that offer immediate, tangible connection or pleasure. This equilibrium likely served you well—it kept you afloat, it gave you pockets of joy, and it didn’t derail your life. The trade-off is that these coping strategies, once brilliant solutions, can become habits that outlast their original purpose.
What might be the most underestimated resource in your profile is not simply your control over gaming and content, but the evidence of your capacity for discernment. You are not a person who gets hooked on everything; you are selective. That selectivity means you already have a sophisticated, perhaps unconscious, decision-making process about where you invest your digital attention. It’s as if a part of you knows how to say “no” to the things that don’t truly meet your needs, and “yes, but with limits” to the things that do. This ability is a powerful foundation. Another resource, often overlooked, is your moderate score itself: a 37% overall moderate level is not high. Many people would regard their digital habits at this level as entirely unproblematic. That you sense a slight unease speaks to a refined self-awareness, a standard you hold for yourself that is more about feeling in charge than about pathology. That kind of internal compass is a strength, not a weakness.
If something were to shift first, it would likely be in the realm of your readiness to change. Right now, that readiness sits at pre-contemplation, which is the phase before we even think about action. But pre-contemplation is not a permanent state; it can evolve naturally through gentle curiosity. The first change might be a tiny shift in attention: a moment where you catch yourself reaching for your phone to shop or message and you pause—not to stop yourself, but just to notice. That pause, without any “shoulds,” would be the concrete sign. It might feel like a half-second of awareness: “Oh, I’m doing this now.” Nothing else has to happen. That pause alone begins to move you from automatic pilot into a more conscious relationship with your habits. And from that pause, over time, might come a spontaneous question: “Do I really want this right now, or is it just there?” This isn’t about forcing change; it’s about letting the natural process of recognition unfold, in your own time, at your own pace. The goal is not to eliminate these outlets—they may still have a healthy role—but to restore the feeling that you are the author of your choices, not a passenger.
Ultimately, your profile is not a warning sign; it’s a snapshot of a woman who is doing pretty well, but who cares about doing better. That caring is itself the engine of any growth. You have the self-knowledge, the selective restraint, and the fundamental wellbeing to trust your own timing. If you ever decide you want to nudge these habits, you’ll do it not from a place of fear but from a place of strength, because the very skills that keep gaming and binge-watching at bay are the same skills that can gently reshape your relationship with shopping and messaging. They just need to be invited into those rooms.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Video Games
Online Shopping
Content
Communication
Readiness to Change
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. Not being able to play leaves me neither irritable nor restless.
Answer : Often
You answered "Often". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. Not being able to access my usual content is no loss to me.
Answer : Often
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. A message read and left unanswered does not make me anxious.
Answer : Sometimes
4. My online purchases are known to those around me.
Answer : Sometimes
5. When I decide to cut down my gaming time, I manage it.
Answer : Often
6. I feel an emptiness or intense boredom as soon as I have no content to consume.
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page