An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 11 dimensions
Obsessions & intrusive thoughts · Compulsions & rituals · Checking · Contamination & washing · Order, symmetry & exactness · Taboo thoughts · Doubt & need for certainty · Perfectionism & rigidity · Mental rumination · Distress & functional impact · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your profile presents a moderate overall level of obsessive and compulsive symptomatology (50%), yet the distribution reveals a clinically meaningful pattern: while your intrusive thoughts, checking, doubt, and rumination are mild, your compulsions, contamination fears, taboo thoughts, perfectionism, and functional distress are all marked (60%). This suggests that the maintenance of your OCD is driven less by obsessive thinking itself and more by behavioral and emotional avoidance—the rituals, the contamination-driven safety behaviors, the perfectionist rigidity, and the shame-fueled withdrawal from the intrusive thoughts. At 36, you are navigating professional and relational demands while managing this distress; the marked functional impact indicates that your OCD is no longer a background noise but an active constraint on your quality of life, affecting time allocation, emotional freedom, and possibly relationships.
One central pattern worth noting: your marked compulsions and contamination fears likely reinforce one another through a cycle in which washing and avoidance temporarily reduce contamination anxiety, but they strengthen the underlying belief that contamination is genuinely dangerous, perpetuating both the fear and the ritual. Similarly, your perfectionism may fuel contamination fears (by setting impossibly high cleanliness standards) and amplify distress around taboo thoughts (by generating shame about having 'imperfect' or morally unacceptable thoughts). The silver lining is that your mild rumination, mild obsessions, and mild doubt suggest you retain significant cognitive flexibility and capacity for decision-making outside OCD domains—strengths that you can leverage in therapy. Your functional distress, though painful, is also clinically meaningful because it motivates engagement in treatment and because OCD-focused CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) is highly effective for this exact profile: compulsion-driven, emotionally avoidant, perfectionist, and contamination-focused OCD responds powerfully to structured therapeutic intervention. Recovery is not only possible but probable with appropriate support.
Overall result
Moderate obsessive symptomsYour answers suggest a moderate obsessive-compulsive profile (50%). Certain dimensions — which may include thought-action fusion, perfectionism, mental neutralizations or reassurance behaviors — manifest recurrently enough to weigh on your psychic comfort. This picture, without necessarily reaching the diagnostic thresholds of DSM-5 or ICD-11, indicates obsessional tendencies that deserve targeted work. The good news is that this level responds well to strategies drawn from cognitive-behavioral approaches, in particular work on obsessional beliefs and tolerance of uncertainty.
Moderate obsessive symptoms
10 dimensions to strengthen
10 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Intrusive, recurrent and unwanted thoughts, images or urges that force themselves in and generate anxiety.
Your answers suggest a moderate level of obsessional thoughts (40%), characterized by recurrent yet still manageable mental intrusions. These thoughts seem to occur occasionally, generating passing discomfort without paralyzing your daily functioning.
Based on reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this profile deserves attention without constituting a severe picture. Clinical psychology research emphasizes that the tendency to fight or neutralize intrusive thoughts can paradoxically increase their frequency, a phenomenon known as the cognitive rebound effect.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Repeated acts or mental rituals performed to reduce the anxiety linked to obsessions, according to rigid rules.
Your answers suggest a high level of compulsive behaviors (60%), characterized by frequent rituals that are time-consuming and draining of mental and physical energy. This profile indicates that compulsions probably occupy a significant place in your days, interfering with your activities, your relationships and your well-being.
According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this picture corresponds to clinically significant compulsive symptomatology. Clinical psychology research confirms that the more compulsions are performed, the more they reinforce the belief in their necessity, making stopping them progressively harder without structured help.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
A need to check repeatedly (doors, gas, devices, messages) out of fear of a disaster or a mistake.
Your answers suggest a moderate level of checking behaviors (40%), characterized by recurrent doubt that leads you to check your actions occasionally but regularly. This profile indicates that checks, though still manageable, generate a loss of time and a slight erosion of confidence in your own judgment.
According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this picture deserves attention. Clinical psychology research emphasizes that each additional check reinforces doubt rather than resolving it, feeding a cycle that becomes progressively hard to interrupt without a targeted strategy.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Fear of dirt, germs or contamination, with excessive washing or cleaning and avoidance.
Your answers suggest a marked fear of contamination (60%), with washing, decontamination or avoidance that occupy a significant space in your daily life. According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this level corresponds to real functional interference: activities, places or interactions are probably restricted to limit perceived exposure.
The obsessional dynamic is clearly visible here: the compulsion relieves temporarily but durably reinforces the fear. Recognized approaches such as CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) show solid effectiveness on this profile. Your answers suggest that structured support would be particularly beneficial.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
A need for things to be aligned, symmetrical or "just right", with intense discomfort when things are out of place.
Your answers suggest a slightly elevated need for order and symmetry (40%), manifesting as tension when objects, arrangements or layouts deviate from an internal standard. This level corresponds to a zone of vigilance: the corrections made are still manageable but occupy notable attention.
In terms of clinical screening, one observes the early signs of the phenomenon known as sensory phenomena — that sensation of "not quite right" that precedes the compulsion. Recognized approaches such as CBT suggest that interrupting the correction-relief-reinforcement cycle early prevents escalation. Your answers invite you to experiment with tolerating asymmetry gradually.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Intrusive thoughts with aggressive, sexual or blasphemous content, experienced as shameful and contrary to one's values.
Your answers suggest a marked presence of intrusive thoughts with taboo content (60%), accompanied by notable emotional distress — shame, guilt, self-disgust or fear of being "bad." According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this profile corresponds to the subtype known as "pure intrusive-thought OCD" or "intrusive thoughts OCD," often misunderstood and a source of isolated suffering.
The central feature here is the radical gap between the content of the thoughts and the person's deep values: this gap is itself the distinctive sign of the symptom. Recognized approaches such as CBT have demonstrated strong effectiveness on this profile. Your answers clearly suggest the importance of professional support.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Permanent pathological doubt, intolerance of uncertainty and a need to be absolutely sure before acting.
Your answers suggest a slightly elevated need for certainty (40%). In the register of psychological screening, this profile corresponds to moments when uncertainty generates slight tension that can prompt checking, seeking confirmation or delaying a decision until more assurance is obtained.
These mechanisms remain manageable at this stage, but deserve attention because, according to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, intolerance of uncertainty is recognized as a transdiagnostic factor involved in OCD, generalized anxiety and other anxiety disorders. Working on this point preventively can prevent an escalation toward more invasive checking rituals.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Excessive demand for perfection, rigidity of personal rules and difficulty tolerating error or "good enough".
Your answers suggest marked rigid perfectionism (60%), with a notable impact on your time, your energy and probably your relationship with error. This profile evokes inflexible standards, severe self-criticism when results do not reach the expected level, and difficulty considering a task finished.
According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, rigid perfectionism is a central transdiagnostic factor, strongly involved in OCD, anxiety disorders and mood disorders. Recognized approaches such as CBT have developed specific protocols targeting dysfunctional perfectionist beliefs with documented clinical effectiveness.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Repetitive, unproductive thinking: dwelling, endless mental analysis and trying to "solve everything" in your head.
Your answers suggest a moderate level of rumination (40%). This profile evokes episodes of repetitive thoughts centered on past or future concerns, generally manageable but present in a notable way. Clinically, rumination is distinguished from productive reflection by its cyclical nature, its lack of resolution and its focus on the problem itself rather than on solutions.
According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, it constitutes a transdiagnostic factor involved in obsessional, depressive and anxious dynamics. At this stage, simple behavioral and cognitive strategies can make it possible to effectively interrupt the loops before they intensify.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Suffering linked to symptoms and the impact on time, work, relationships and quality of life.
Your answers suggest a marked functional impact (60%): your daily time, your interpersonal relationships and your freedom of action seem notably affected by invasive thoughts or repetitive behaviors. This level corresponds to a clinically significant repercussion according to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, indicating that the suffering exceeds the threshold of ordinary discomfort.
Quality of life is probably reduced, with a real psychic, social or professional cost. Care suited to this stage is generally effective and can significantly ease this repercussion within reasonable timeframes.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your profile exhibits a clear reinforcement loop across several marked dimensions that maintain each other. Marked compulsions (60%) and contamination fears (60%) form a bidirectional cycle: contamination anxiety triggers washing, avoidance, and checking rituals; these rituals temporarily relieve anxiety, reinforcing the belief that the contamination threat is real and that the ritual is necessary; this strengthens future contamination fears and compulsive urges. Your marked perfectionism (60%) amplifies this by raising the standard for 'clean enough', making contamination anxiety feel more justified and compulsions feel more urgent. Taboo thoughts (60%) interact with this system through shame and emotional avoidance: the intrusive thoughts generate distress partly because your perfectionist standards include moral purity, making the thoughts feel like evidence of wrongdoing; this shame triggers avoidance (social withdrawal, isolation) and mental compulsions (reassurance-seeking, thought suppression), which paradoxically strengthen the thoughts themselves.
The marked functional impact (60%) reflects the cumulative burden of these three reinforcing cycles: time consumed by compulsions, relationships strained by avoidance and perfectionist demands, emotional energy depleted by shame and contamination anxiety. A critical mechanism across all marked dimensions is 'experiential avoidance'—the use of rituals, avoidance, and mental strategies to escape unbearable discomfort—which, while providing short-term relief, maintains the underlying OCD by preventing you from learning that the feared outcome is not as catastrophic as it feels. Breaking these cycles requires shifting from avoidance to acceptance and gradual exposure, which is precisely the aim of Exposure with Response Prevention (ERP) and Acceptance-based therapies: by tolerating contamination anxiety without washing, taboo thoughts without reassurance, and imperfection without correcting, you teach your nervous system and your mind that these experiences are survivable and that they naturally diminish without ritual.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — sympathetic / chronic mobilization with threat of tipping into dorsal shutdown
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — All-or-nothing thinking
Cognitive pattern — Mind reading / Inflated moral responsibility
Early schema — Defectiveness / Shame
Early schema — Unrelenting Standards / Intolerance of imperfection
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
OCD and rumination
Cognitive model of OCD (Salkovskis)
Sources: Salkovskis (1985)
Thought-action fusion
Sources: Rachman (1993) ; Shafran, Thordarson & Rachman (1996)
Metacognitive model (Wells)
Sources: Wells (2009)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
When we step back from the individual scores, a central logic emerges: your world is shaped less by the frequency of intrusive thoughts than by a powerful conviction that certain things must be kept in order—physically, morally, and mentally. Your perfectionism (marked) and contamination fears (marked) seem to act as twin engines, driving the marked compulsions and the shame-laced avoidance of taboo thoughts. Perfectionism sets a high, often rigid standard for how you, your environment, and even your mind should be. Contamination fear then specifies what threatens that standard: anything that feels 'unclean'—whether a germ, a mistake, or a forbidden impulse—must be neutralized. The compulsions become the tools for that neutralization: washing, ordering, mentally undoing. The relatively mild obsessions, rumination, and doubt suggest that the raw material of intrusive thoughts does not, on its own, hook you deeply; it’s the behavioral response—the rituals and the rigidity—that locks the cycle in place. This explains why functional distress is marked: your energy is consumed not by wrestling with thoughts, but by performing and maintaining safety routines, leaving less room for spontaneity, relationships, and ease.
This configuration creates a profound internal tension. What it makes easy is a sense of control, predictability, and moral integrity. You likely come across as reliable, thorough, and conscientious—traits that may have earned you respect and stability. You can create order out of chaos, avoid visible mistakes, and feel a certain safety when everything is 'right'. What it makes costly is equally significant. The rituals and rigidity demand time and emotional bandwidth, often leaving you depleted. The shame attached to taboo thoughts can push you into silence and isolation, as if a part of you must remain hidden. The very control that brings relief also narrows your life, making it harder to tolerate the messiness of intimacy, the ambiguity of complex decisions, or the simple pleasure of leaving a dish unwashed. The marked functional impact signals that this equilibrium is no longer a neutral maintenance system; it has become an active constraint, pinching your freedom and perhaps making you feel that you are living to manage OCD rather than managing OCD to live.
How might such an equilibrium have taken shape? Often, patterns like these serve a vital purpose before they become a burden. You may have learned early—perhaps in a demanding, critical, or chaotic environment—that to keep things orderly and error-free was to keep anxiety or disapproval at bay. Perfectionism could have been a shield against criticism; contamination fears, a way to maintain control when boundaries felt fragile. Taboo thoughts, if viewed as morally dangerous, would naturally invite intense self-policing. The system once protected you: it offered a script for navigating uncertainty, a sense of agency when the world felt unpredictable. It may have carried you through academic pressures, early career demands, or family roles that required flawless performance. Now, at 36, with professional and relational demands pulling you in multiple directions, the same system expects you to sustain that flawless performance across an ever-widening stage—and it overfunctions, treating ordinary life as a series of threats that require ritual resolution.
Within this profile, a quiet resource deserves attention: the fact that your obsessions, doubt, and rumination are mild. This suggests that you are not constantly entangled in cognitive loops. When a distressing thought arises, you may have a natural capacity to let it pass if you do not engage in a ritual. The engine isn't the thought itself but the urgency to act upon it. That mildness is a foundation you can build on—it hints that your mind is capable of living with uncertainty when not pushed by the demand for absolute order or purity. Also, your mild checking and low doubt suggest that in many areas of your life, you trust your own judgment. You can make decisions and move forward without repeatedly verifying. These underused strengths—the ability to observe a thought without being ruled by it, and the confidence in your own eyes—are the raw materials for change. They show that the rigidity is not a character trait but a learned strategy that can be practiced differently.
What might shift first? A promising place is the perfectionism, because it stitches together the contamination fears and the compulsions. If you could tolerate a small, deliberate imperfection—perhaps an item slightly out of place, or a hand washed only once instead of twice—you might discover that the feared consequence does not materialize, or that the distress is briefer than expected. The concrete sign that change is taking root would be a moment of surprise: you notice the urge to ritualize, you choose a different action, and the anxiety gradually fades rather than escalates. This would be a new learning, a crack in the old logic. Because your rumination and obsessions are already mild, such experiments are less likely to trigger a spiral of overthinking. You are not starting from a place of chaotic mental noise; you have internal space to observe, experiment, and recalibrate. The goal is not to eradicate all caution or order—these traits have value—but to loosen the grip of the rituals so that you can recover time, emotional freedom, and the courage to face the taboo thoughts without shame. This portrait is a hypothesis, not a verdict, and you are the expert on whether it resonates with your lived experience.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Obsessions & intrusive thoughts
Compulsions & rituals
Checking
Contamination & washing
Order, symmetry & exactness
Taboo thoughts
Doubt & need for certainty
Perfectionism & rigidity
Mental rumination
Distress & functional impact
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I cannot chase certain thoughts away.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I feel compelled to carry out these acts.
Answer : Sometimes
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I have no fear of having forgotten something serious.
Answer : Often
4. I am afraid of germs and contamination.
Answer : Sometimes
5. I feel tension until it is "right".
Answer : Rarely
6. I am afraid of doing harm against my will.
Answer : Sometimes
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 11 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€4.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page