Chargement…
An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Intimate physical comfort · Intimate self-image · Communicating needs · Adapting and finding solutions · Openness to talking about it
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your profile tells a story that has an order, and that order is probably more instructive than the scores themselves. What is lowest is physical comfort. Just above it comes the image you have of yourself in intimacy. Then the ability to talk about it. And right at the top, your willingness to understand and your capacity to adapt. Read this way, the picture does not describe an intimacy that is dying out: it describes a chain that started somewhere and spread.
The starting point is bodily, and that is good news even if it does not present itself as such. A sensation that has become unpleasant, dryness, unusual sensitivity — these manifestations are among the most common of menopause, and they are among the very few that are almost never talked about. Many women carry them for years without mentioning them, concluding that there is nothing to be done, when in fact there is a great deal to be done and the answers are often simple. What makes this situation costly is not the discomfort itself: it is that it goes unnamed.
The rest of the chain writes itself. A body that has become unpredictable gets watched, and watching takes up attention exactly where pleasure would need it. That is what your answers about self-image describe: thoughts about what has changed crossing your mind at the least opportune moment. This is not a lack of self-confidence, it is a predictable consequence. And it means that the order of interventions matters: trying to repair the way you look at yourself before having treated the body amounts to tackling the second link while leaving the first.
What makes your picture movable is your two high scores. You are already adapting, and you are willing to talk. It is simply worth noticing that your capacity to adapt can, here, work against you: it allows you to cope, and therefore to postpone. This report does not tell you what you ought to feel, or at what pace. It offers a reading of what your answers sketch today, and you remain the sole judge of what, in all this, matches your experience.
Overall result
Intimacy in transitionYour intimate well-being is going through some turbulence, but it is not settled into difficulty. Your answers sketch a picture in which the body is the most unsettled part — discomfort, sensitivity, apprehension — while your ability to look for solutions and your willingness to talk remain solid. This order matters: when physical discomfort comes first, everything else often organizes itself around it without anyone noticing. We end up attributing to desire, to age or to the relationship what begins with an unpleasant sensation that was never named. This report suggests working back up that chain the other way, starting with what can be dealt with most concretely.
Intimacy in transition
5 dimensions to strengthen, 0 strength
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Your body makes itself felt during intimate moments: dryness, unusual sensitivity, or simply an apprehension about what is going to happen. It is the lowest dimension in your profile, and it is also the one that responds best to treatment.
This is the lowest score in your profile, and it is probably not a vague feeling but something very specific: a sensation that was not there before and is there now. Your answers point to dryness or unusual sensitivity, and a tendency to avoid certain moments for purely physical reasons. What this test cannot say is what exactly is going on — but it can say one useful thing: what you describe is among the most common manifestations of menopause, and it is also one of the very few that are least talked about. Many women live for years with an intimate discomfort they have never mentioned to anyone, neither to their partner nor to a doctor, sometimes because the subject does not come up during an appointment, sometimes because they think there is nothing to be done.
Yet there is a great deal to be done, and the solutions are often simple. One point deserves your particular attention: when a physical discomfort settles in without being named, it turns into apprehension, and apprehension in turn changes what the body feels. The chain closes without anyone having seen it form. It is this mechanism, more than the discomfort itself, that probably explains why your intimate self-image is low as well. None of this is inevitable, and none of it is a matter of willpower: it is a matter for a medical consultation.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your relationship with your sexual body has hardened. Thoughts about what has changed occupy your mind at the very moment when you would need to be able to forget it.
Your answers describe something very particular, and very frequently reported: during intimate moments, part of your attention stays busy assessing your body rather than feeling. This phenomenon has long been described in sexology under the name of self-observation, or spectatoring, and it has a mechanical consequence — attention is a limited resource, and whatever is used to watch oneself is no longer available for experiencing. In other words, it is not only that you judge yourself: it is that this judgment takes the place of pleasure. At menopause, this mechanism finds particularly fertile ground, because the body changes quickly and visibly, and because these changes arrive in a culture that talks a great deal about the bodies of young women and almost never about anyone else's.
It should be noted that your physical comfort score is even lower than this one. That order suggests a hypothesis — one only you can confirm: your self-image would not have deteriorated on its own, it would have deteriorated in response to a body that had become unpredictable. We watch ourselves when we are dreading something. If that reading matches your experience, then working on self-image without treating the physical discomfort would amount to correcting a symptom while leaving its cause in place. The reverse — treating the body and observing what becomes of the way you look at yourself — is often more effective, and quicker.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
You more or less know what you would need, but saying it — to someone close, to a partner, to a professional — remains difficult.
This intermediate score describes a fairly precise situation: it is not that you would not know what to say, it is that saying it costs something. Your answers suggest that you would feel moderately comfortable raising these changes with a healthcare professional, which is already much better than a refusal, and not yet a step actually taken. This hesitation has reasons that are not personal. The vocabulary of intimacy after menopause is poor and medicalised; there is almost no ordinary way of talking about it, neither between friends, nor within a couple, nor in a consultation, where the subject is rarely opened spontaneously on either side.
So we stay silent less out of modesty than for want of any available wording and of any precedent. There is a concrete issue here, and it matters more than it seems: the physical discomfort your profile describes cannot be resolved without being spoken. It is the only dimension in your picture that absolutely requires a third party. You can work on your own attention, your habits, the way you look at yourself; you cannot treat an intimate discomfort on your own. This average score is therefore the lock on everything else, and it is also the one that can shift the fastest — sometimes in a single conversation, prepared in one sentence.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
You adjust, you try things, you look for what suits you. That is a real resource and it is already at work.
This score is markedly higher than the previous ones, and it changes how the whole picture reads. Your answers describe someone who is not simply enduring: you have changed things, you look for information, you allow yourself adjustments that suit you. That is important to name, because the prevailing discourse about menopause is made almost entirely of incapacity and loss, and your profile says something else. It is worth looking, however, at what this adaptation has made possible, and what it could not. It has probably worked well on whatever depended on you: the pace, the timing, the conditions, the place you give intimacy in a busy week.
It could not resolve the physical discomfort, because that is not a matter of adjustment but of care. There is a quiet risk in profiles like yours, and it deserves to be flagged: a good capacity to adapt can delay a consultation, because it allows you to cope. We make do, we work around it, we avoid certain moments, and the problem stays bearable — and therefore never treated. Your ability to find solutions is a real strength; it becomes an obstacle only when it is used to put up with something that would not have to be put up with.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
You are trying to understand what you are going through and you are ready, if the opportunity arises, to put it into words.
This is the highest score in your profile, and it is probably what makes the whole thing movable. You are neither giving up nor avoiding the subject: you want to understand, and you would feel entitled to talk about it if the opportunity arose. On this particular theme, that is a minority position, and it should be treated as a resource rather than as politeness. Intimate well-being at menopause is surrounded by a dense silence, and that silence has a measurable cost: it turns an ordinary development into a personal anomaly. Each woman concludes on her own that she is the only one affected, when what she describes is what most women her age describe.
What remains is to use this willingness in the right place, and it is better to choose only one. Physical discomfort is a matter for a healthcare professional — your GP, a gynaecologist, a midwife. What concerns pace, expectations, the way moments get started is more a matter for your partner, if you are in a relationship. These are not the same conversations, they do not call for the same words, and wanting to have them all at once is the surest way to have none of them. Your profile suggests starting with the most concrete one, because it is also the one whose effects come quickest.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Three links stand out in your profile, and the first is the most structuring: your physical comfort and your intimate self-image are the two lowest scores, in that order. That proximity is almost never a coincidence. A body that becomes unpredictable during intimacy starts being observed, and self-observation consumes the attention that would serve to feel. The most likely sequence therefore runs from the body towards the way you look at yourself, and not the other way round. If that reading is right, it has an immediate practical consequence: a consultation that resolves the discomfort can lift your self-image without anyone having worked on self-image.
The second link joins your communication of needs, which is average, to your physical comfort, which is low. These two dimensions sustain each other in a particularly silent way: what is not said cannot be treated, and what is not treated becomes harder and harder to say, because the time that has passed is added to the embarrassment. Many women describe exactly this spiral, with a delay counted in years. It is the only place in your profile where a third party is indispensable, and so it is the lock.
The third link is far more favorable, and it concerns your two high scores. Your capacity to adapt meets a high willingness to talk about it: that is the combination that produces the most effect when it is aimed at the right object. One reservation nonetheless, and it is worth stating: a good capacity to adapt makes it possible to endure, and enduring delays. Nothing in your picture describes a closed circle — the low dimensions are precisely those that move fastest as soon as a professional enters the equation.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — secure, with a reticence limited to the intimate domain
Nervous system state — quiet vigilance during intimate moments
Cognitive pattern — Mind reading
Cognitive pattern — Emotional reasoning
Cognitive pattern — Overgeneralization
Early schema — Defectiveness / Shame
Early schema — Unrelenting Standards
Early schema — Subjugation
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Cross-cutting clinical lenses
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Sense of self-efficacy (Bandura)
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Emotion regulation (Gross)
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
There is a story in your answers whose order matters more than the scores, and that order is probably the most useful thing you will take away. The lowest point is your body's comfort. Just above it comes the way you look at it in intimacy. Then the difficulty of putting it into words. And right at the top, your capacity to adapt and your willingness to understand. Read this way, your profile does not describe an intimacy that is dying out: it describes a chain, with a very identifiable first link.
This first link is physical and it is commonplace — in the statistical sense of the word, not in the sense of being unimportant. Dryness, unusual sensitivity, the sense of a body that no longer responds as it used to: these are the most common manifestations of menopause on the side of intimacy, and they are also the ones least talked about. Many women carry them for years. Not out of excessive modesty, but because nothing in the ordinary course of a consultation makes room for this subject, and because a very widespread conviction holds that there is nothing to be done. That conviction is false, and it is probably the only thing this report can state without reservation.
The rest of the chain then writes itself almost entirely on its own, without anyone deciding anything. A body that has become unpredictable gets watched. You do not notice it, because the watching happens through brief, almost trivial thoughts of the « is it going to be all right tonight » kind. But attention is a limited resource: whatever is used to assess is no longer available to feel. That is exactly what your answers about intimate self-image describe — thoughts about what has changed arriving at the least opportune moment. This is not a lack of self-confidence. It is the predictable consequence of a discomfort that could not be anticipated and has never been named. That distinction is liberating, because it completely changes the order of what there is to undertake.
Next, it is worth looking at the particular place speech occupies in your picture, because it is the only place where you cannot do anything on your own. Your attention, your habits, the conditions you give yourself: all of that depends on you. An intimate discomfort does not. It calls for a third party, a consultation, possibly a therapeutic answer — and therefore a sentence spoken out loud. Your score on this dimension is average, which does not describe a refusal but a hesitation, fed less by modesty than by the absence of any available vocabulary and of any precedent. On this subject, everyday language offers almost nothing between the clinical and the intimate, and many women give up less out of embarrassment than for not knowing how to begin.
What makes your situation movable is your two high scores, and they are real. You adapt: you have changed things, you look for information, you adjust what can be adjusted. You are willing to understand and to talk if the opportunity arises. That combination is the one that produces the most effect when it is aimed at the right object. One reservation should be flagged, however, because it is common among people who adapt well: this skill allows you to cope, and coping allows you to postpone. We make do, we avoid certain moments, we find conditions that work better, and the problem becomes bearable — and therefore never treated. Your capacity to adapt is a strength; it becomes a trap only when it is used to put up with what would not have to be put up with.
If one single thing were to be taken from this report, it would therefore be the order rather than the content. Start with the body, because that is where the ratio of effort to effect is most favorable, and because a consultation takes twenty minutes where work on self-image takes months. The sign that something is shifting will not, moreover, be spectacular: it will rather be noticing, one evening, that the little anticipatory calculation did not happen — and recognizing that silence for what it is, not a pleasant surprise, but a body that has stopped having a reason to be wary.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Intimate physical comfort
Intimate self-image
Communicating your needs
Adaptation and solutions
Willingness to talk about it
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I feel physically good after an intimate moment.
Answer : A little
You answered "A little". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I feel desirable and comfortable in my own skin.
Answer : Moderately
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I find the words to express what I feel in intimacy.
Answer : A little
4. I feel well supported and surrounded during this period.
Answer : Moderately
5. I still experience physical pleasure during intimate moments.
Answer : A little
6. I feel attractive and confident in intimate situations.
Answer : Moderately
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page