An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Inattention · Hyperactivity · Impulsivity · Executive Functioning · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your screening results indicate a moderate overall ADHD presentation, but with a notably uneven profile: inattention and impulsivity emerge as very high (areas of significant concern), while hyperactivity and executive functioning register as high but not extreme. This pattern suggests that your primary struggle may center on sustaining focus and managing the urge to act without deliberation, rather than on pure restlessness or organizational chaos. At 36, navigating professional expectations, relational responsibilities, and personal goals with these specific challenges likely requires considerable self-management effort and may feel exhausting. A potential reinforcing pattern appears to be at play: difficulties maintaining attention fragment your ability to follow through on plans, while impulsivity and restlessness can interrupt deliberative processes, creating a cycle where executive function—even when cognitively available—becomes harder to deploy consistently.
Importantly, your executive functioning is not severely impaired, which indicates that you possess cognitive resources that can be mobilized through structure, external support, and behavioral strategies. However, the presence of two very high dimensions (inattention and impulsivity) alongside two high dimensions suggests that professional evaluation by a psychiatrist or neuropsychologist specializing in adult ADHD would be valuable—not to confirm a diagnosis (screening tests do not diagnose), but to understand whether pharmacological support, therapy, coaching, or a combination might help reduce the cognitive load and create space for behavioral change. Your age, professional and relational commitments, and the cumulative impact of these challenges all point toward the value of seeking specialized assessment and support soon. This is not a reflection of weakness; it is a recognition that certain cognitive processes benefit from targeted intervention.
Overall result
Moderate symptomsYour answers suggest a moderate presence of symptoms that might evoke ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). This profile indicates that certain dimensions — sustained attention, impulse control, organization or activity level — show vulnerabilities that may weigh on your daily life in a recurring way, without necessarily being disabling. Clinically, this type of presentation is common in adults who have developed effective compensatory strategies over time, but at the cost of substantial cognitive and emotional effort. Periods of increased load or change can reveal or amplify these difficulties. An exploratory consultation with a professional would help clarify the origin of these symptoms and consider targeted avenues of support.
Moderate symptoms
4 dimensions to strengthen
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Ability to sustain attention, focus on details, and follow instructions without becoming distracted.
Your answers suggest very pronounced attentional difficulties, the intensity of which suggests a substantial impact on your daily, professional and relational life. Clinically, this profile points to a profound disruption of attention-regulation mechanisms: the ability to voluntarily initiate, sustain and shift focus appears severely compromised.
The cumulative consequences — unfinished tasks, forgotten commitments, relational conflicts linked to apparent inattention — can feed a sense of chronic failure and undermine self-esteem. This level of difficulty calls for specialized professional support to precisely assess the nature of the difficulties and offer structured guidance.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Level of physical restlessness, difficulty remaining still, and constant need for movement.
Your answers suggest a significant level of hyperactivity, likely to disrupt your social, professional and sometimes physical functioning. Clinically, in adults, high hyperactivity can translate into an inability to remain seated in situations that require it, an inner sense of constant simmering, a tendency to start many activities at once without finishing them, or nighttime restlessness affecting sleep.
These manifestations can be misinterpreted by those around you as a lack of seriousness or commitment. According to the reference criteria (such as DSM-5, ICD-11), this level of hyperactivity persisting across several contexts warrants a thorough clinical assessment.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Tendency to act without thinking, interrupt others, and make hasty decisions.
Your answers suggest very pronounced impulsivity, the intensity of which suggests a major impact on many aspects of your daily life. Clinically, this level points to a profound disruption of inhibitory control: the ability to interrupt an automatic behavioral or verbal response appears severely compromised, making relationships unstable, decisions risky and the management of frustration particularly difficult.
Recognized approaches such as CBT (cognitive-behavioral therapy) and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) offer tools specifically designed to rebuild these inhibition capacities. This picture calls for referral to a qualified mental-health professional for care adapted to the intensity of the clinical presentation.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Ability to plan, organize, manage time, and regulate behavior to achieve goals.
Your answers suggest significant executive difficulties, whose frequency and intensity suggest a notable impact on your daily functioning. Clinically, this profile points to a disruption of the processes of planning, task initiation, time management and mental flexibility: procrastination may be chronic, started projects often remain unfinished, and deadlines are regularly missed despite sincere intentions.
Working memory can be easily overloaded, generating frequent forgetfulness and a feeling of being constantly overwhelmed. These difficulties are closely associated with ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder) profiles according to the reference criteria (such as DSM-5, ICD-11) and warrant a specialized assessment.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your profile reveals a striking interconnection between inattention, impulsivity, and executive functioning that likely creates a self-reinforcing cycle. Here is one possible reading: attention fragmentation makes it difficult to maintain awareness of goals and consequences, which reduces the cognitive friction needed to inhibit impulses; impulsive action then derails planned tasks, undermining confidence in planning and increasing reliance on crisis-driven urgency to activate execution; high hyperactivity adds physical restlessness that further destabilizes sustained focus and deliberation, while also potentially channeling into compensatory over-activity or task-switching that mimics poor planning.
Conversely, a virtuous cycle is possible: by addressing impulsivity through structured decision-making protocols (like the STOP method or cooling-off periods), you reduce the fragmentation of your plans; this success can build confidence in your ability to plan, which in turn strengthens executive engagement; coupling this with movement that discharges hyperactivity may ease the pressure that feeds both attention disruption and impulsive action. The key insight is that these dimensions are not independent challenges—they likely interact in ways that make solving any one of them somewhat harder, but also means that progress in one area may catalyze improvement in others. Your cognitive capacity (suggested by your executive functioning score) exists; the work is to create structures and reduce the interference so that capacity can be directed toward what matters to you.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — sympathetic/mobilization with dysregulation
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — All-or-nothing thinking
Early schema — Defectiveness
Early schema — Unrelenting standards
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Attention and executive functions
Executive functions (Barkley)
Sources: Barkley (1997) ; Barkley (2012)
Inhibition model (Barkley)
Sources: Barkley (1997)
Working memory (Baddeley)
Sources: Baddeley (1992)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Big Five (OCEAN)
Sources: Costa & McCrae (1992) ; Goldberg (1990)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Your screening scores sketch a portrait where the most pressing forces are a wandering attention and a readiness to act before reflection has fully unfolded. These two dimensions—inattention and impulsivity—seem to steer your experience far more than restlessness or a compromised executive system. Think of them as a powerful duo: your attention scatters, you lose the thread of a plan, and in that gap, an impulse rushes in to fill the void, producing an action that might not be what you would have chosen with more deliberation. The hyperactivity you feel likely isn’t the engine of this process but its exhaust—your body responding to a mind that is constantly skipping between stimuli and reacting on the fly. Meanwhile, your executive functioning, though strained, is not shattered; it’s like a skilled manager trying to run a meeting where two unruly participants keep derailing the agenda. In this sense, the whole profile is organized by the interplay of inattention and impulsivity, with everything else echoing their rhythm.
The internal tension this configuration draws is unmistakable: you carry a mind that can be remarkably quick, creative, and perceptive, yet it struggles to stay still long enough for depth. What comes easily is the ability to notice many things at once, to pivot in conversations with agility, to generate ideas in a burst, to react fast when a situation demands speed. What becomes exquisitely costly is the sustained, quiet focus required for long-form work, for seeing a project through its final tedious steps, for being present in a slow moment without feeling an itch to move on. The result is an exhausting paradox—you may often feel both overstimulated and underachieving, as if you’re running a race in a car that accelerates beautifully but keeps veering off track. Relationships and self-image can take a hit when you see yourself interrupting, forgetting, starting things eagerly only to abandon them, while internally you know your capabilities are greater than your follow-through.
How might such an equilibrium have emerged? It often makes sense as an adaptation to environments that were demanding in their own way. Perhaps you grew up or spent formative years in settings where being on high alert, shifting rapidly between tasks, and reacting without hesitation were not only useful but rewarded. A chaotic household, a fast-paced professional culture, or even a long period of crisis can teach the nervous system to treat sustained attention as a luxury and impulsivity as a survival skill. At 36, you might have internalized a story that you are simply scattered or unreliable, without recognizing that this very pattern once kept you afloat. Now, the contexts of your life—perhaps a career that requires deep thinking, caregiving, or the cumulative weight of adult responsibilities—no longer match the strengths of that older adaptation. The cost has become visible, but the habit remains.
Yet within this profile lies an underappreciated resource: your executive functioning, though it scores high, is more resilient than it feels. The fact that it is not severely impaired means that when you can erect a temporary scaffold—a clear external structure, a body double, a manageable deadline, a quiet environment—your capacity to plan, organize, and persist can come online strongly. You are not lacking the cognitive machinery; you are contending with a noisy reception. In calmer moments, you probably have experienced pockets of startling clarity and competence. That latent ability is not an occasional fluke; it is a steady ground you can learn to stand on more frequently by working with, rather than against, your attention and impulses.
If something were to shift first, it might be the moment of noticing. Not the heavy-handed effort to “fix” yourself, but a gentle, curious awareness of exactly when your focus drifts or an impulse rises. You might begin to catch, just for a fraction of a second, the sensation of your mind reaching for a new tab or your mouth opening before you’ve weighed the words. That pause, however tiny, is a crack where something new can grow. A concrete sign that change is stirring would be that you stop yourself mid-scroll or mid-sentence—not perfectly, not every time, but occasionally—and feel a flicker of a choice point. That would indicate that the automatic pilot of inattention and impulsivity is no longer running quite as smoothly, and that you are beginning to re-enter the driver’s seat with compassion for the road you’ve traveled.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Inattention
Hyperactivity
Impulsivity
Executive Functioning
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I lose focus when a task is long or repetitive.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I make careless mistakes in my work or daily activities.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I have trouble listening carefully when someone is speaking directly to me.
Answer : Rarely
4. I leave unfinished what I start (projects, household chores, correspondence).
Answer : Rarely
5. I am easily distracted by what is around me (noises, movements, conversations).
Answer : Rarely
6. I misplace the items I need (keys, phone, documents).
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page