Chargement…
An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Recurring Partner Choice · Old Roots · Fixed Role · Unconscious Cycle · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile reveals a relational pattern in which deeper emotional dynamics—rooted in your past and playing out almost automatically—are the primary drivers, while your initial partner selection itself shows only moderate recurrence. This suggests that the 'stuckness' you may feel is not primarily about whom you choose, but about what unfolds once you are in relationship. Your high scores in 'Old Roots' and 'Unconscious Cycle' function as reinforcing dynamics: the older, emotionally charged patterns from your past are so ingrained that they activate reflexively, even when your conscious mind recognizes them. The moderate scores in 'Recurring Partner Choice' and 'Fixed Role' indicate you have some flexibility here—you are not locked into a single type of partner or a rigid way of being—yet this flexibility may actually be obscured by the stronger pull of automatic emotional replays.
At 36, you bring adult perspective and the life experience to recognize these patterns, which is itself a significant advantage. Many people never see the cycle at all. Your challenge now is translating awareness into change, which typically requires support beyond self-reflection alone. It is also worth noting that your gender context may amplify certain relational patterns: women statistically carry more emotional labor in relationships, and family-of-origin messages about women's roles in caregiving and harmony-maintenance can deepen these automatic grooves. This is not a personal failing—it is a context to name explicitly as you work toward shifts. Your capacity for awareness, combined with targeted support, positions you well for meaningful change.
Overall result
ModerateYour answers suggest a few repetitive tendencies in your relational life, without them yet constituting a rigid schema that generates significant suffering. In clinical psychology, this stage represents a productive zone of vigilance: automatisms are beginning to take shape, but awareness and flexibility remain sufficient to change their course. Recognized approaches such as CBT emphasize that bringing these tendencies to light early — before they consolidate — is the most effective lever for preserving relational freedom and preventing the establishment of a more constraining schema.
Moderate
4 dimensions to strengthen
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Tendency to be drawn to the same kind of profile, often unavailable or problematic
Your answers suggest that a certain recurrence is beginning to take shape in your romantic choices, without yet being systematic or rigidly fixed. In clinical psychology, this intermediate stage corresponds to a useful zone of vigilance: repeated preferences often reflect a partially activated attachment schema that steers attraction toward emotionally familiar profiles rather than truly suitable ones.
Bringing these tendencies to light at an early stage represents a valuable opportunity to change course before the schema consolidates and generates repeated suffering.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
A sense of replaying familiar dynamics from your history in love
Your answers suggest that your current relationships frequently replay emotional dynamics arising from your personal history, with a notable emotional charge. Recognized approaches such as schema-focused CBT and psychodynamically informed therapies describe this process as a reactivation of internal attachment models: the present relationship becomes, partly unbeknownst to you, the stage for an old scenario.
This overlap between past and present generates intense emotional responses, relational misunderstandings, and sometimes a sense of powerlessness in the face of dynamics that replay in spite of oneself, despite one's lucidity.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Tendency to always occupy the same role (rescuer, submissive, over-giver, controlling...)
Your answers suggest a moderate tendency to occupy a recurring role in your relationships — such as the person who gives, adapts, or takes charge — without this tendency being rigid or systematic yet.
In clinical psychology, this type of repeated role often reflects attachment strategies developed to maintain the bond in a specific early context. They remain useful in certain contexts but can, when they become automatic, reduce the space available for one's own needs and gradually create an imbalance in relational reciprocity.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Automatic, repeated nature of the cycle, despite awareness or harm
Your answers suggest that the repetitive cycle replays frequently despite your lucidity, like an automatism hard to stop through willpower alone. Recognized approaches in clinical psychology explain this phenomenon by the fact that deep relational schemas rely on largely implicit emotional and behavioral processes, which operate upstream of reflective awareness.
Intellectual understanding of the cycle, although necessary, is therefore not enough to deactivate it: it is also necessary to work at the level of the conditioned emotional responses and automatic behaviors that keep it in place.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The interaction between your high 'Old Roots' (60 percent) and high 'Unconscious Cycle' (60 percent) creates a powerful reinforcing loop: the older, emotionally charged patterns from your past have become so deeply wired that they activate automatically in your current relationships, often before your conscious mind can intercede. This is a vicious cycle of sorts, but not in a hopeless way—it simply means that breaking it requires more than intellectual insight. Your moderate scores in 'Recurring Partner Choice' and 'Fixed Role' suggest that the repetition is not driven primarily by selecting the same type of partner or rigidly adopting one relational stance; rather, it is the emotional choreography within the relationship that replays.
This has an important implication: even if you were to partner with someone entirely different from your exes, the same underlying dynamics might still emerge once the relationship deepens. Conversely, this also means that if you can interrupt the automatic emotional cycle—perhaps through external support, new relational experiences, or targeted therapeutic work—the pattern can shift regardless of whom you choose. The key leverage point appears to be working with the automaticity itself and the roots that feed it, rather than trying to control your initial attractions or alter your relational stance alone.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — anxious / disorganized (mixed presentation)
Cognitive pattern — Thought-action fusion / magical thinking
Cognitive pattern — Overgeneralization
Early schema — Abandonment / Instability
Early schema — Subjugation / Enmeshment
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Recognised couple/relationship frameworks applied to the relationship you described — as hypotheses to test against your experience, never as conclusions about the other person.
Adult attachment
Your high scores on "Old Roots" (60%) and "Unconscious Cycle" (60%) suggest that attachment patterns formed in childhood or in past relationships are replaying in your current choices. It may be that you are drawn to partners who reproduce a familiar dynamic — even when that dynamic has been a source of suffering. Recognizing this mechanism is often the first step towards moving beyond it.
Sources: Hazan & Shaver (1987) ; Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991)
Drama triangle (Karpman)
Your moderate "Fixed Role" profile (40%) together with a high "Unconscious Cycle" (60%) sometimes points to a tendency to occupy a fairly stable relational role — Victim, Persecutor or Rescuer — and to attract partners who complete that role. Do you recognize a pattern in which you play the same "part" in every relationship, even with different partners?
Sources: Karpman (1968)
Triangular theory of love (Sternberg)
Your moderate to high repetition pattern may reflect a persistent imbalance between intimacy, passion and commitment across your relationships. It may be that you tend to reproduce the same balance (or imbalance) — for example, a lot of passion but little genuine intimacy, or an emotional fusion that stands in for solid commitment. Have you noticed this particular balance coming back?
Sources: Sternberg (1986)
Nonviolent Communication (Rosenberg)
Your high score on "Unconscious Cycle" suggests that you may express your needs in a similar way from one relationship to the next, and that you attract partners who respond to that style in predictable ways. It may be that you hesitate to express your needs clearly and non-violently, which keeps misunderstandings or cycles of blame going. How do you communicate your needs in your relationships?
Sources: Rosenberg (2003)
The Gottman model
Your high "Unconscious Cycle" may indicate that you and your successive partners reproduce the same pattern of interaction — perhaps an escalation of criticism, or a mutual withdrawal. It may be that the positive-to-negative ratio is skewed in the same way from one relationship to the next. Do you notice the same kind of "difficult moment", or the same style of conflict, coming back?
Sources: Gottman (1999) ; Gottman & Silver (1999)
FIRO (Schutz)
Your profile suggests stable interpersonal needs — inclusion, control, affection — that seek expression through each successive relationship. It may be that you are drawn to partners who offer (or withhold) the same level of these needs, creating a predictable repetition. Have you identified one particular need that always brings you back to the same dead end?
Sources: Schutz (1958)
The Five Love Languages (Chapman)
Your moderate "Recurring Partner Choice" (40%) may reflect an attraction to partners who speak (or fail to speak) a similar love language — for example, you try to give quality time or acts of service, but receive criticism in return. If you keep running into the same kind of emotional misunderstanding, this may be a language pattern worth exploring.
Sources: Chapman (1992) — proposed/debated theory
At the heart of your profile lies a quiet but powerful dynamic: the emotional echoes of your past (Old Roots) set the stage, and an almost invisible automatic script (Unconscious Cycle) brings them to life in your current relationships. These two dimensions, both registering at a high level, work in tandem like the engine and wheels of a repeating journey. Your partner choices are only moderately repetitive, and the roles you adopt show similar flexibility. This tells us something crucial: the pattern you are noticing is not primarily about whom you pick or what character you play, but about a deeply internal rhythm that starts beating once intimacy grows. The Old Roots dimension seems to act as the foundation—it holds the emotional memories, the learned expectations, and the visceral sense of what love, safety, or conflict feel like. The Unconscious Cycle is how that foundation expresses itself in real time, often without your conscious say-so. Your moderate scores on choice and role suggest you have some leeway at the edges: you are not condemned to repeat the same outward story. But the inner story, the one scripted by early experience, has a strong gravitational pull. This is why you might find yourself with different kinds of partners yet feel the same knot in your stomach, or why you can switch roles but still land in the same emotional dead-end. The overall pattern is less about a stuck groove and more about a repeating emotional weather system, one that forms regardless of the landscape below.
This configuration creates a specific internal tension, one that you likely experience as both freeing and confining. What it makes easy is the initial phase of connection: because you are not rigidly seeking a single type, you can meet a range of people, stay open, and adapt your role fluidly. You might be good at reading others, at fitting in, at making a relationship work on the surface. But what becomes costly is the hidden tax: you invest energy in managing something that feels outside your control once emotional intensity rises. The high Unconscious Cycle means that your reactions—jealousy, withdrawal, neediness, or criticism—can erupt with a force that surprises you, as if someone else is at the wheel. The tension emerges between the conscious you, with your adult perspective and good intentions, and these reflexive patterns that feel ancient. This can leave you bewildered, guilty, or exhausted. You might wonder, “Why do I keep doing this when I know better?” The answer, as your profile hints, is that knowing is not the same as feeling safe enough to change course. The flexibility you have in choice and role can even obscure the pattern: because the external details vary, you may think each relationship is new, only to collide with the same emotional wall. Thus, the costly part is a sense of futility—a feeling that growth is always out of reach, just when you think you've outrun the past.
How did such a pattern take root? Psychologists often view these dynamics as adaptive strategies learned in our earliest connections. Your high Old Roots score suggests that your formative relational environment left a strong emotional imprint. Perhaps you grew up in a setting where love was inconsistent, where conflict was frightening, or where certain feelings had to be managed underground. In response, your young mind built a template: a set of expectations about what to anticipate and how to respond to maintain attachment or protect yourself. This template was likely a brilliant child-sized solution. If showing neediness brought comfort, you learned to amplify need. If withdrawing avoided punishment, you learned to disappear. The Unconscious Cycle is the continuation of that old solution—your brain, even now, automatically runs the program it wrote decades ago, because it was crucial for survival then. The moderate scores in partner choice and fixed role might reflect that you also had some freedom to explore: maybe you weren’t utterly trapped in one role, or you observed different relationship models, giving you a broader repertoire. So your story is not one of total repetition, but of a specific, emotional repetition that lived alongside some outward flexibility. It is as if you carry a familiar, haunting melody from childhood that can be triggered by many different instruments—different partners, different circumstances—without you even realizing the tune is the same.
Yet within this profile lies a vastly underrated resource: your very flexibility and awareness. The moderate levels in partner choice and role are not just “better” than high scores; they are proof that you already know how to do something different. You are not stuck in a single type or a rigid role. This indicates a capacity for observation, a self that can step back and notice, “Wait, I’ve been here before.” At 36, you are in a prime position to use this observer self. Many people struggle with far more rigid patterns and lack any sense that change is possible. Your ability to see the cycle—even if it still operates—is the first and most critical step toward transformation. Additionally, the fact that you took this test and are reflecting on the feedback shows curiosity and a growth mindset. You are not avoiding the discomfort; you are approaching it with an intention to understand. That courage is a profound resource, one that can anchor the challenging work of shifting from automatic reaction to mindful response.
Change, when it comes, will likely not announce itself with trumpets. It will show up as a tiny gap between a trigger and your usual response. At present, when an old emotional button is pushed, you might react almost instantly—a flash of anger, a wave of despair, a sudden withdrawal. But as you continue to deepen your awareness, the first thing that might shift is a pause. One day, you will feel the familiar surge and, instead of being carried away, you will think, “Ah, there it is.” That moment of noticing, without judgment, is the beginning of integration. It is the brain’s signal that a new neural pathway is being paved alongside the old one. A concrete sign to look for: you apologize less for your feelings and become more curious about them. Or you catch yourself before sending that reactive text, and you choose to say something like, “I’m feeling triggered right now, can we talk later?” That might seem small, but it is monumental. From that pause, you can experiment: get a glass of water, take three deep breaths, ask yourself what you really need. You might find that the old root is still there, but its grip softens. Over time, you can rewrite the script—not by erasing the past, but by integrating it into a more conscious, chosen way of being in love. And the moderate flexibility you already have will be your ally, because you already know how to adapt externally; now you’ll learn to adapt internally, with compassion.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Recurring Partner Choice
Old Roots
Fixed Role
Unconscious Cycle
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I feel I always end up with the same type of partner.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I am drawn to emotionally unavailable people.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. Stable and available people seem dull or uninteresting to me.
Answer : Rarely
4. I feel an immediate, intense attraction to profiles that end up hurting me.
Answer : Rarely
5. My relationships end for surprisingly similar reasons.
Answer : Rarely
6. I choose partners that my circle finds problematic every time.
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page