An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Insecurity · Surveillance · Social Comparison · Emotional Reactions · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile presents a moderate to moderately high jealousy pattern, with important variation across dimensions. The standout feature is your elevated surveillance and emotional reactivity—two dimensions that strongly reinforce each other and, together, appear to be the primary behavioral expression of your jealousy. Your moderate insecurity and social comparison scores suggest that your jealousy is rooted in relational worry and some vulnerability to self-comparison, but these are not your most pronounced traits. As a 36-year-old woman, you bring life experience and presumably some awareness of relational patterns, which is a genuine strength for change. However, the combination of high emotional reactivity with high surveillance suggests a cycle that, if unaddressed, can progressively erode trust and safety in your relationship.
The positive finding is that these patterns are not fixed; they are learned responses shaped by your history, your nervous system's regulation capacity, and your current relational context. Your insecurity is moderate, not severe, and your comparison vulnerabilities are also in the moderate range, which means that targeted work on emotion regulation and deliberate reduction of surveillance behaviors could yield substantial shifts in both how you experience jealousy and how your partner experiences your presence. This work is possible with structured effort—through individual therapy, couples work if your partner is willing, and specific behavioral experiments—but it requires patience with yourself and commitment to changing familiar patterns.
Overall result
Moderate jealousyYour answers suggest a moderate level of jealousy: present and perceptible, but still within limits that allow relative management. Clinically, this profile indicates that certain specific situations — your partner's interactions with third parties perceived as attractive, unexplained absences, ambiguities on social networks — activate emotional and behavioral jealousy responses that occasionally exceed the comfort threshold. Without specific work, this level tends to fluctuate according to life events and can intensify during periods of stress or relational instability. Early attention to these mechanisms is a wise psychological investment.
Moderate jealousy
4 dimensions to strengthen, 0 strength
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Deep feeling of not being good enough, fear of losing the other person to someone better.
Your answers suggest moderate relational insecurity that appears in certain specific situations rather than continuously. Clinically, this may reflect past relational experiences — breakups, betrayals, messages of emotional unavailability received in childhood — that left an imprint on your attachment system without deeply destabilizing it.
These moments of insecurity activate occasional patterns of vigilance: a need for reassurance, passing ruminations, or heightened sensitivity to certain signals. Recognizing these specific triggers is already a first clinically significant step, as it helps distinguish an emotional reaction from an objective relational reality.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Checking and controlling behaviors regarding your partner's activities, communications, and relationships.
Your answers suggest frequent and intrusive monitoring behaviors that place significant pressure on the dynamics of your relationship. Clinically, this level of monitoring indicates that the need for informational control has become a central mechanism for managing relational anxiety.
Paradoxically, the more intense the monitoring, the more it erodes trust — in you as well as in your partner — creating a cycle that is hard to break without targeted intervention. This pattern can also generate significant psychological fatigue and a sense of shame. Recognized approaches such as CBT and attachment-focused therapies offer specific tools to work on these mechanisms.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Tendency to compare yourself to others and perceive threats in your partner's social interactions.
Your answers suggest that social comparison affects you occasionally, feeding passing feelings of inadequacy or competition. Clinically, this mechanism is common and relies on well-identified cognitive biases: the tendency to overestimate the qualities of perceived rivals and to underestimate one's own, particularly under the effect of relational anxiety.
Social network environments structurally amplify these comparisons by exposing us to a selection of idealized images. At this moderate level, these comparative thoughts are still distant enough to be questioned and reframed, before they settle in as dominant automatic patterns.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Intensity and nature of the emotional reactions triggered by jealousy-inducing situations.
Your answers suggest jealousy-related emotional reactions that are often intense and difficult to regulate, with a tangible negative impact on your relationship and quality of life. Clinically, this profile may indicate significant emotional dysregulation: the emotional response system races beyond the threshold of reflective processing, producing reactive behaviors that you may become aware of afterward without having been able to prevent them.
This mechanism is often fueled by catastrophic cognitive patterns, heightened sensitivity to rejection, and low tolerance of uncertainty. Recognized approaches such as CBT offer specific protocols to work on this type of dysregulation.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The elevated surveillance (60%) and emotional reactivity (60%) dimensions form a reinforcing cycle worth examining. High emotional reactivity creates frequent, intense moments of jealousy and fear, and in these states, surveillance (checking, monitoring, questioning) feels like a natural coping mechanism—a way to 'know' and therefore control threat. However, surveillance, when detected by your partner, typically triggers defensive or distant responses, which then validates your initial fear and insecurity, prompting more intense emotional reactions and further surveillance. This is sometimes described as a 'protest-withdraw' or 'pursue-withdraw' pattern, and it is self-perpetuating.
Interestingly, your moderate insecurity (40%) is numerically lower than these behavioral symptoms, which suggests that the intensity and frequency of your reactions may exceed what your baseline insecurity alone would predict—in other words, once jealousy is triggered, your emotional response system amplifies it significantly. This is also clinically important because it means that emotion regulation techniques may be even more powerful for you than cognitive work on insecurity alone. Breaking this cycle requires simultaneous work on two fronts: reducing the frequency and intensity of emotional reactions through regulation practice, and reducing surveillance behaviors through deliberate exposure and alternative coping. As one shifts, it creates space for the other to shift as well, opening the possibility of a positive spiral in which less surveillance leads to less defensive withdrawal, which reduces the fear that drives insecurity, which makes emotional reactions more manageable.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — anxious
Nervous system state — sympathetic (mobilization)
Cognitive pattern — catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — mind reading
Cognitive pattern — dichotomous thinking (all-or-nothing)
Early schema — abandonment
Early schema — defectiveness
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Recognised couple/relationship frameworks applied to the relationship you described — as hypotheses to test against your experience, never as conclusions about the other person.
Adult attachment
Your profile at times evokes an anxious attachment style, marked by heightened preoccupation with your partner's availability and faithfulness. It may be that you regularly look for signs of relational security, and that uncertainty or ambiguity in the relationship activates an emotional vigilance. Do you have the impression that you often "check" where your partner stands, or that a lack of clarity creates tension in you?
Sources: Hazan & Shaver (1987) ; Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991)
Gottman model
The high scores in emotional reactivity and monitoring suggest that relational conflicts might be amplified by a sensitivity to your partner's behavior. It may be that criticism (particularly towards yourself or towards them) sets in more readily during disagreements, or that defensiveness feels like a natural protection to you. Have you noticed that discussions quickly become intense, or that you focus on one detail of your partner's behavior that worries you?
Sources: Gottman (1999) ; Gottman & Silver (1999)
Triangular theory of love (Sternberg)
Your relational vigilance and your emotional reactions could reflect a doubt about the balance between intimacy (mutual trust) and commitment (the stability you would like). It may be that passion is present, but interwoven with anxiety about how lasting the bond will be. Do you sometimes wonder whether your partner really shares the same level of relational "certainty" that you are looking for?
Sources: Sternberg (1986)
Nonviolent Communication (Rosenberg)
Your scores suggest that it might be difficult to express your underlying needs (security, trust, recognition) without their taking the form of questions, demands for explanations, or reproaches towards your partner. It may be that you say "you ignored me" rather than "I felt isolated and I need to reconnect". Consider this: when jealousy rises, do you name what you are truly afraid of?
Sources: Rosenberg (2003)
FIRO (Schutz)
Your profile evokes a potentially unmet need for inclusion (being seen, counted, treated as a priority) and for affection (visible, repeated proof of the bond). It may be that you put in a great deal of effort to be sure of being "chosen", and that emotional monitoring is an attempt to plug a feeling of emptiness or uncertainty. Can you identify the moment when you feel you are "enough" for your partner?
Sources: Schutz (1958)
The Five Love Languages (Chapman)
It is possible that you express your affection through a strong need for quality time or reassuring words, while your partner expresses it differently (acts, independence, etc.). This mismatch could intensify your need to "check" whether they really love you. Have you explored how your partner prefers to receive or show affection, and communicated your own needs explicitly?
Sources: Chapman (1992) — proposed/debated theory
Drama triangle (Karpman)
Your relational vigilance could sometimes place you in the role of the "anxious Victim" ("they don't give me the security I expect"), or conversely push you to take on the role of the "Controller" (monitoring in order to pre-empt betrayal). It may be that these roles switch without your having genuinely sought direct communication. Do you recognize these alternations, and how they affect the dynamic?
Sources: Karpman (1968)
You have a relationship with jealousy that is not defined by a quiet, chronic dread, but by a sharp, reactive vigilance. Your scores show that the engine of this pattern lies in the interplay between your high emotional reactivity and your high surveillance tendencies, while the roots in self-doubt and social comparison are more tempered. This suggests that jealousy, for you, is less about a foundational belief that you are not enough, and more about a nervous system that is exquisitely tuned to potential threat and a mind that habitually seeks evidence to confirm or dispel that sense of alarm. Emotional reactions are the louder, faster signal: a flash of hurt, a surge of fear, a moment of helpless anger that flares before you can weigh its accuracy. Surveillance then becomes the behavioral extension of that inner fire—a way to try and bring the world into focus, to find certainty that can quiet the storm. But the two together often form a closed loop: the more intensely you feel, the more compelled you are to check; the more you check, the more ambiguous signals you encounter, which then re-ignites the emotional cascade. Because your insecurity and social comparison scores are moderate rather than severe, you are not drowning in a constant undertow of self-critique. You may even know, on a rational level, that your partner cares, that the threat is not as imminent as it feels. This is a genuine opening, because it means that calm, reflective parts of you are accessible—they just get temporarily hijacked by the more hair-trigger systems.
The tension this configuration creates is a specific, exhausting kind: you are capable of deep love and fierce protection of the relationship, yet the very tools you use to protect it—alertness, checking, readiness to react—can cost you the ease and trust you long for. It is as if you are always bracing slightly, even in quiet moments, your body and mind ever so slightly scanning for a crack. This vigilance can make you incredibly perceptive; you probably notice things others miss, tiny shifts in tone or timing. But that same gift becomes a burden when it keeps you from resting fully inside the relationship. What is easy for you is detecting inconsistency and feeling the full weight of a possible betrayal early. What is costly is the emotional payment: the constant low-level depletion, the moments of intense distress, and the slow erosion of spontaneous closeness when your partner may feel watched rather than held.
This pattern almost certainly did not appear out of nowhere. It is a learned architecture shaped by experiences where uncertainty truly hurt—perhaps a past betrayal, a childhood environment where trust was broken in important ways, or even a series of smaller relational disappointments that taught your system that vigilance equals safety. It could also be shaped by a cultural or family context where a watchful, protective stance was modeled as love. At some point, this habit of heightened observation and strong emotional signaling served you. It may have helped you leave a bad situation earlier than you would have otherwise, or it gave you a sense of agency when you felt powerless. That historically useful function is important to honor, because it means this reaction pattern is not a flaw or a sickness; it is a once-adaptive strategy that has outlasted its original context. As a woman in your mid-thirties, you bring a capacity for reflection that a younger self may not have had; you can start to see the pattern as something you have, rather than something that defines your character.
An underappreciated resource in your profile is precisely that moderate level of insecurity. This might sound strange, but because you are not relentlessly battered by self-doubt, you have a steadier internal ground to stand on when you are not triggered. You can recall moments when you felt secure, when you did not need to check, when your emotions were not hijacked. Those moments are not illusions—they are evidence of a self that already knows another way. Your social comparison, also moderate, suggests you do not constantly measure your worth against others in a way that destroys you; you can acknowledge that others have qualities without automatically concluding you are lacking. These inner resources mean that the work ahead is less about building self-worth from scratch and more about creating a pause between the trigger and the reaction—a pause where that steady, reasonable part of you can whisper, “Let’s wait, let’s see, let’s breathe.” Your nervous system may still sound the alarm loudly, but you might be more able, with practice, to turn down the volume.
The first thing that might shift is not the disappearance of jealousy, but a subtle change in its texture. The sign could be a single instance where you feel the familiar jolt—the knot in the stomach, the urge to check—and you decide to do nothing. Not because you squashed the feeling, but because you recognized it as an inner weather pattern, not a fact. Maybe you say to yourself, “This is my old habit waking up; the situation doesn’t demand immediate action.” That moment of non-action, of choosing curiosity over control, would be a cracking open of the loop. If you can notice that you survived those minutes without checking, that the disaster did not arrive, you start teaching your brain a new possibility: safety is not only found by controlling the external, it can be built inside. That initial shift is modest, almost invisible to others, but it is profound—it indicates that the emotional reaction no longer has total authority over your behavior. From that tiny wedge, a larger space can grow.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Insecurity
Surveillance
Social Comparison
Emotional Reactions
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I'm afraid my partner will find someone better than me.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I lose my composure when I feel jealous.
Answer : Sometimes
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. When my partner comes home late without warning, I immediately imagine the worst.
Answer : Sometimes
4. When my partner says they find a celebrity very attractive, it bothers me.
Answer : Rarely
5. I feel threatened by the attention my partner gives to others.
Answer : Rarely
6. When jealousy rises in the middle of an evening out, I struggle to hide it.
Answer : Sometimes
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page