An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Compulsive Checking · Social Comparison · FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) · Impact on Self-Esteem · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile reveals a social media relationship that is moderate in overall intensity but notably skewed toward comparison and emotional impact rather than pure behavioral compulsion. At 36, you are at a life stage where social media can serve as both a professional and social tool, yet also as a source of comparison that is difficult to resist, particularly given the curated nature of contemporary platforms. The clustering of your two highest scores—social comparison (60%) and impact on self-esteem (60%)—alongside moderate scores in compulsive checking (40%) and FOMO (40%), suggests that your primary vulnerability is not addiction in the sense of uncontrollable use, but rather a pattern in which selective engagement with social media creates emotional consequences.
This is a clinically meaningful finding because it points toward specific levers: moderating not just frequency but content quality and your mindset during engagement. The moderateness of your overall score (50%) indicates that this is a manageable challenge at this stage, and one in which intervention can be both effective and protective. However, the persistence and visibility of comparison and self-esteem impact across daily life warrant deliberate attention now, before patterns deepen. Your capacity to check your phone somewhat intentionally (moderate compulsive checking) suggests you retain executive control that can be strengthened. The combination of your age, gender, and the specific pattern of your results suggests that the meaningful work ahead is less about digital detox and more about developing a more critical, boundaried relationship with what you consume and how you interpret it.
Overall result
ModerateYour answers suggest moderate signs of problematic social media use, which may occasionally affect your emotional well-being and quality of life. Clinically, this profile is characterized by a combination of partly automated checking, sensitivity to social comparison dynamics and a slight dependence on online validation signals. These mechanisms remain at a stage where targeted behavioral adjustments are generally enough to restore balance, without requiring specialized intervention. Clinical psychology research shows that becoming aware of triggers and restructuring the digital environment are the most effective levers at this stage.
Moderate
4 dimensions to strengthen
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Frequency and automatic nature of social media checking
Your answers suggest that checking social media sometimes becomes automatic, partly escaping your conscious control. Clinically, this corresponds to an emerging activation of conditioned reinforcement circuits: notifications, scrolling loops and variable rewards (likes, messages) begin to short-circuit your deliberate decisions.
This phenomenon remains at a moderate and therefore easily reversible stage, but it deserves attention. Clinical psychology research shows that these automatic patterns gradually strengthen if nothing is adjusted. Regaining control over your environmental triggers is the first effective step.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Tendency to compare yourself to others through content posted on social media
Your answers suggest that social comparison via social media is a significant factor of psychological distress in your daily life. Clinically, this level of exposure to chronic upward comparison is associated with a gradual erosion of self-esteem, an increase in ruminative thoughts and a weakening of body image.
Clinical psychology research clearly documents the link between frequent exposure to idealized content and increased anxious and depressive symptoms. Recommendation algorithms tend to amplify this phenomenon by suggesting ever more content of the same type, creating a psychologically impoverished environment.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Fear of missing information, events, or trends
Your answers suggest that you sometimes feel the fear of missing something when staying disconnected, without this persistently dominating your behavior. Clinically, FOMO at this moderate stage corresponds to situational anxiety linked to monitoring the social stream: the person feels a slight tension at the idea of cutting themselves off from real-time information, but retains the ability to resist it.
This mechanism is sustained by the very design of platforms, which create a sense of urgency and stream continuity to maximize connection time. At this stage, voluntary and repeated disconnection is the most effective therapeutic lever.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Consequences of social media on confidence and self-image
Your answers suggest that social media has a significant and regular impact on your self-esteem and emotional well-being. Clinically, this level of impact corresponds to a partial dependence on digital validation to regulate self-image: online feedback — or its absence — durably affects the perception of one's own worth.
Clinical psychology research clearly establishes a link between this state and an increased risk of anxious and depressive symptoms. Recognized approaches such as CBT offer effective tools to identify and modify the cognitive patterns that link self-esteem to external recognition.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
A significant correlation appears between your high social comparison score and high self-esteem impact score: these dimensions reinforce one another in a cycle that warrants attention. When you engage with social media and encounter curated presentations of others' lives, comparison is likely triggered, which in turn affects how you feel about yourself and your own life. This pattern is sometimes described as a 'comparison trap'—each exposure can incrementally erode mood and self-perception, which may then unconsciously drive further checking in search of reassurance or distraction, only to repeat the cycle. Conversely, a potential protective element emerges from the gap between your comparison and FOMO scores: you appear to have some emotional separation from the fear of missing out itself, which suggests you may already hold some perspective that not all content is essential.
This more measured stance toward FOMO could serve as a foundation for rebuilding your relationship with comparison—the cognitive work of questioning comparison narratives may feel more accessible than addressing fear-based checking. A secondary observation is that your moderate compulsive checking, paired with high self-esteem impact, suggests that even limited exposure is creating significant emotional consequences, which indicates that the content you do consume is particularly potent for you. This is valuable information: it means that curation (choosing what you see) may be more impactful than simple reduction (using less overall).
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — Sympathetic (mobilization) with swings toward dorsal vagal (freeze / shutdown)
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — Social comparison and all-or-nothing thinking
Cognitive pattern — Overgeneralization and mind reading
Early schema — Defectiveness / Shame
Early schema — Emotional Deprivation / Subjugation
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Addictions and dependencies
Biopsychosocial model (Griffiths)
Sources: Griffiths (2005)
Relapse prevention (Marlatt)
Sources: Marlatt & Gordon (1985)
Operant reinforcement
Sources: Skinner (1953)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Your relationship with social media isn’t one of volume but of emotional texture. The engine here seems to be the quiet, almost automatic way you compare what you see to your own life—your career, your relationships, your sense of where you should be at 36. That comparison (which registered as your highest dimension) doesn’t just hover; it settles, affecting how you feel about yourself. Interestingly, the checking itself isn’t frantic or out of control, and the fear of missing out is moderate. So the central logic appears to be this: you don’t feel compelled to be on social media all the time, but when you engage, you’re drawn to content that invites you to measure your insides against others’ outsides, and that measurement becomes a subtle filter through which you see your own worth. This means social comparison may act as the organizing dimension—it doesn’t drive the frequency of use, but it shapes the *quality* of your experience and the emotional aftermath. The other scores orbit around it: self-esteem dips because comparison is active; checking stays moderate because you can step away; FOMO is moderate because the emotional cost of staying might temper the fear of missing out.
The internal tension this creates is a kind of double-edged connectedness. On one hand, social media likely serves you well as a professional and social tool—you can network, stay informed, maintain ties—and your moderate usage suggests you already have some skills to disengage. On the other hand, the platform becomes a mirror that often reflects back a distorted sense of deficiency. What is made easy: staying in the loop; what is made costly: maintaining a stable, compassionate view of yourself when that loop includes highly curated success stories. This can leave you in a bind: you don’t want to lose the benefits, but each passive scroll can quietly erode your sense of okayness. The cost isn’t dramatic; it’s more like a slow leak of self-acceptance.
A plausible history for this equilibrium might involve life contexts where observation and self-measurement were adaptive. Perhaps you grew up in an environment—family, school, early career—where being aware of others’ achievements helped you set your own benchmarks, or where subtle comparison was a way to figure out your own path. At 36, this might be amplified by a life stage where peers are hitting milestones (promotions, partnerships, parenting) that feel like cultural yardsticks. Social comparison may have originally served as a kind of social radar, helping you navigate expectations and position yourself. The fact that it now leans into self-esteem impact could reflect that the radar became overly sensitive, or that the world it monitors has become more filtered and less real. The overall moderation of your profile hints that this pattern hasn’t consumed your life; it’s more like a familiar groove that gets worn down when you’re tired, uncertain, or in transition.
An underappreciated resource in your profile is the very moderation of compulsive checking and FOMO. These are not scores of someone who is helplessly tethered to their device; they suggest an innate capacity to pause, to prioritize, to let go of the feed. This capacity is a genuine strength—it means you already have a baseline of self-regulation. That you check moderately despite high comparison suggests you might already have some unconscious strategies to protect yourself (like avoiding certain platforms at certain times). Leaning into this strength could involve making those strategies more intentional, without needing to overhaul who you are. The fact that you’re reading this also shows you have insight and curiosity, which are the very tools that transform a pattern.
What might shift first is not your amount of use, but your *awareness in the moment*. A concrete sign that this is moving could be noticing, mid-scroll, the subtle drop in your mood or the beginning of a critical inner voice, and saying to yourself, “That’s the comparison starting, and it’s not a full picture.” The shift isn’t a dramatic exit from social media; it’s a gentle, repeated choice to interrupt the chain between seeing and judging. Another early sign might be that you begin to seek out or create content that connects you to your own values rather than to others’ achievements, and you notice a slightly lighter feeling afterward. These small wins accumulate, not by eliminating comparison (which is human), but by giving your self-esteem a softer landing.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Compulsive Checking
Social Comparison
FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out)
Impact on Self-Esteem
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I check social media as soon as I wake up, before any other activity.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I automatically open a social media app when I unlock my phone.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I spend more than an hour a day scrolling through feeds.
Answer : Rarely
4. I interrupt conversations or activities to check my notifications.
Answer : Rarely
5. I check social media during meals, while commuting, or while waiting.
Answer : Rarely
6. I find it hard to put down my phone at night because of social media.
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page