An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Grandiosity · Need for admiration · Lack of empathy and exploitation · Narcissistic vulnerability · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Léa,
The profile you describe in Thomas, with moderate narcissistic traits, sketches a functioning where the regulation of his self-esteem seems to rest partly on external cues. His need for admiration and sensitivity to criticism take, according to you, a notable place, as shown by the moderate scores on these two dimensions. What sets this profile apart is the absence of grandiosity and exploitative tendencies: nothing in what you report suggests he seeks to elevate himself above others or use them to shine. On the contrary, the empathy you credit him with and a certain realism seem to let him maintain relatively authentic ties — with you in particular. Yet the 'need for admiration — vulnerability' pairing deserves your attention, as it can generate emotional rollercoasters in him where the slightest disapproval touches him more deeply than he'd like — and which you often feel first.
Your own readiness to act on this situation is currently at the precontemplation stage, which is normal: nothing is pressing you. It may be that Thomas's moderate need for admiration attempts to counterbalance schemas of imperfection and excessive criticism internalised earlier in his life, making him particularly attentive to signs of recognition to soothe a vulnerability that fragilises him more than it defines him. This, combined with the empathy you credit him with and his low tendency to exploit, suggests his main struggle plays out more against a demanding inner ideal than within the relationship with you, where he remains capable of staying attuned to the other. If you ever perceived these oscillations as weighing too heavily on you, know that resources exist, for him as for you.
Overall result
Moderate traitsThe behaviours you describe in your partner, Thomas, sketch a profile of moderate narcissistic traits, present to varying degrees depending on context rather than consistently. Clinically, this level indicates that the different facets — grandiosity, need for admiration, empathy, vulnerability — colour his functioning intermittently without necessarily dominating it. You may notice relational tensions, particular sensitivities, or recurring patterns, without this amounting on its own to a disorder. This profile invites a closer look at the most marked dimensions of what you observe in him, without reducing him to a label or drawing a diagnosis from this report alone.
Moderate traits
2 dimensions to strengthen, 3 strengths
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
The behaviours you describe suggest that the "Grandiosity" facet is not very present in Thomas. Clinically, this indicates that cognitive patterns linked to a sense of superiority, exceptionality, or entitlement to special treatment do not seem to significantly drive his thoughts, decisions, or social interactions, based on what you observe. His self-image appears relatively grounded in a realistic assessment of his abilities and his place among others, without defensive over-investment in his self-image. This result is one marker among the other dimensions explored by this test.
Your low score on this facet indicates that you don't describe Thomas as someone who sees himself as superior to others or expects special treatment. Cross-referenced with a moderate need for admiration, one hypothesis is that his quest for recognition doesn't rest on a sense of exceptionality but on a desire for confirmation of his worth.
This may make him more approachable in your exchanges and support a relatively authentic relationship. However, the absence of this defence could also expose him to feeling criticism more sharply, as the moderate narcissistic vulnerability you report elsewhere suggests — he lacks grandiosity's shield to cushion the blows.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The behaviours you describe suggest that the "Need for admiration" facet is moderately present in Thomas and shows up selectively depending on context. Clinically, this can translate into heightened sensitivity to others' positive regard, marked satisfaction when his achievements are recognised, and slight destabilisation in the absence of expected validation. At this level, this need often functions as a regulator of self-esteem: external approval compensates for a fluctuating internal evaluation. It can influence his career choices, the social circles he frequents, and the quality of his presence in relationships that don't offer validating feedback.
Your moderate score suggests that external validation plays, for Thomas, a non-negligible role in his emotional balance — based on what you observe. Cross-referenced with the also-moderate narcissistic vulnerability you report, a possible mechanism emerges: when the admiration he expects is missing, inner destabilisation can arise in him, feeding ruminations you sometimes witness, or are on the receiving end of.
The fact that his grandiosity is low indicates he doesn't seem to seek this admiration from a position of dominance, but rather as scaffolding for an inner confidence that seems at times hesitant. What you attribute to Thomas here also says something about you: if you're attentive to this need in him, it may also be because you carry the day-to-day fallout of it.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The behaviours you describe suggest that the "Lack of empathy and exploitation" facet is not very present in Thomas. Clinically, this indicates he generally seems able to perceive and take into account others' emotional states, needs, and perspectives in his interactions, based on your account. A tendency to use relationships instrumentally, prioritising his own interest without regard for the other, doesn't appear to be a dominant mode of functioning for him. This result suggests a functional capacity for empathy on his part that supports relationships built on reciprocity. It is one marker among the other dimensions explored.
Your low result reflects a capacity you observe in Thomas to perceive and take into account others' emotions and needs — including, it seems, yours. In a profile where need for admiration and vulnerability are moderate, this empathy is an important relational resource: it suggests he isn't trying to instrumentalise you for his own validation, even during a sensitive phase.
If his vulnerability otherwise makes him sensitive to criticism, this same empathy might help him hear that feedback isn't always a personal attack — though this remains a hypothesis to check against your actual experience with him, not an established fact.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The behaviours you describe suggest that the "Narcissistic vulnerability" facet is moderately present in Thomas and shows up variably depending on context. Clinically, this can translate into heightened sensitivity to criticism, negative regard, or perceived humiliation, particularly when his image or competence is at stake. This vulnerability can generate, in the person concerned, more intense emotional reactions than expected to minor negative feedback, temporary withdrawal, or rumination over wounded pride. It often reflects an underlying fragility of self-esteem that coexists with more visible defences.
Your moderate score highlights a sensitivity you observe in Thomas to negative regard and to situations where his image or competence might be called into question. This vulnerability, combined with the need for admiration you describe, sketches a dynamic where his self-esteem seems to oscillate based on external feedback: a compliment lifts him, a criticism destabilises him — and it's often you who deals with these swings day to day.
The absence of grandiosity may worsen this mechanism in him, since he doesn't have an internal sense of superiority to act as a screen. One possible avenue, which only you can weigh against what you know of him, is that this vulnerability reflects high personal standards, where any perceived imperfection feels like a threat.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
These questions measure YOUR readiness, as the respondent, to act on what you observe in this relationship. Your score indicates you're not yet fully convinced of the need to change something about the current situation — which is a valid stage in the process. Awareness always precedes decision. This report helps you clarify what's at stake for you, not decide for you.
Your precontemplation score indicates that, for now, you don't clearly perceive a need to change your position in this relationship. This is a perfectly valid stage, worth respecting — describing a loved one's traits commits you to nothing more than understanding what you're living through more clearly.
One can imagine that the consequences of what you describe in Thomas don't yet weigh on you enough to trigger a desire for change, or that you already have strategies that maintain an acceptable balance for you. Reading this report with openness, without feeling obligated to act, can already be a form of awareness.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The profile you describe in Thomas is homogeneous and forms a coherent system. The moderate need for admiration and moderate narcissistic vulnerability likely feed each other: when he receives the recognition he hoped for, his self-esteem temporarily stabilises, but when it's missing, his vulnerability activates and fragilises him, which then increases his desire to recover admiration to soothe the wound — a cycle you may observe closely. The weakness of his grandiosity prevents this cycle from tipping into a sense of superiority or arrogant demands, but it also deprives him of the defensive armour that a certain ego inflation sometimes provides.
His capacity for empathy, which you describe as preserved, acts as a relational safeguard: it limits the risk of him instrumentalising you to reassure himself, and suggests he can hear that criticism isn't always personal rejection. Finally, your own low readiness to change at this stage suggests that these dynamics, while present, haven't yet reached a threshold that would push you to question the relationship; it's a stable position this report can illuminate without disturbing it.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Early schema — Unrelenting standards / Excessive criticism
Early schema — Defectiveness / Shame
Young's schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Personality
Dimensional model (DSM-5, Section III)
Sources: American Psychiatric Association (2013)
Mentalization (Fonagy)
Sources: Fonagy, Gergely, Jurist & Target (2002)
Cross-cutting lenses
Young's early maladaptive schemas
Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
The profile you describe in Thomas sketches a particular inner architecture, which could be summed up like this: the backbone of his relationship to himself doesn't seem built on an unshakeable conviction of his superiority, but rather on an acute sensitivity to how others — you, first and foremost — perceive him. It isn't pride that seems to drive him, but uncertainty; not a will to dominate, but a need to be reassured of his worth. At the centre of this configuration probably sits narcissistic vulnerability — that tendency to feel any disapproval as a personal threat — which acts a bit like a hypersensitive barometer in him. It's this that gives his need for admiration its moderate tone: he doesn't seek to be idolised, but he needs your regard to work as a mirror capable of reflecting back a good-enough image of himself. What you describe suggests this quest for reassurance doesn't lead him to trample you or blind himself to his limits — the empathy and absence of exploitative tendencies you report suggest instead that he seeks to earn recognition through the quality of the bond.
This organisation has its own logic, but it also creates tension in your relationship: what it makes easy is authentic exchange, a certain attentiveness on his part. He can come across as pleasant, reasonable, not seeking to take up all the space. What it makes more costly, however, is stability — his, but also yours by extension. When someone depends a little too much on external reflection to know their own worth, the relationship becomes exposed to swings: a compliment can lift him, an offhand remark can knock him down, and it's often you who absorbs these variations day to day. The highest cost may lie in the post-interaction rumination you observe in him, or in the energy you yourself spend trying to make sense of what's going on.
How does such a balance form in Thomas? Here we can only offer hypotheses, which you're free to set aside if they don't resonate with what you know of him. It's possible that, when younger, he grew up in a context where love or recognition had to be earned through a certain restraint, where being flawless mattered more than being assertive. This strategy may have served him well: navigating without major conflict, avoiding outright rejection, developing a keen social intelligence. But it may also have left him this vulnerability as a legacy: when others' regard becomes a point of support, it also becomes a point of fragility — for him, and by extension for your relationship.
In this picture, there's a resource worth highlighting: the empathy and absence of grandiosity you describe in him. These qualities can be mistaken for reserve or weakness, when they're actually a considerable relational asset — they suggest he isn't trying to crowd you out with his presence. This attentiveness, if it holds true in your everyday life, is the foundation of a relationship that can stay workable as long as the swings remain contained.
What might shift first, if you felt the need? Without forcing anything, since you're currently in a phase where change doesn't feel urgent for you. The most accessible move would probably be to keep observing, without judging yourself, the moments when Thomas's need for admiration activates and the effect it has on you. A concrete sign that something has shifted might be a day when, faced with one of his usual reactions, you notice a greater inner distance, as if it touched you a little less. You already have the ingredients for this within you: your capacity to observe, your absence of a final verdict on him, and the part of you that knows your own worth doesn't depend on Thomas's stability.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Grandiosity
Need for admiration
Lack of empathy and exploitation
Narcissistic vulnerability
Readiness to change
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. This person acts superior to most people.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
You answered 'Somewhat disagree'. Can you tell me a bit more about when this shows up in your partner?
It mostly comes out in work situations that matter to him, when he feels under pressure or challenged.
2. This person gets upset when their contributions aren't acknowledged.
Answer : Somewhat agree
And how long have you noticed this in him?
It's been more noticeable the last few months, though I think it's always been there a bit.
3. This person stays indifferent when someone is suffering in front of them.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
4. After a negative remark, this person keeps coming back to it for days.
Answer : Somewhat agree
5. This person checks out when the conversation isn't about them.
Answer : Neutral
6. When you talk about your worries, this person brings it back to themselves.
Answer : Somewhat agree
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Léa's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page