An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Taking care of yourself · Coping with the discomforts · Inner supports · Access to support · Openness to talking about it
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your profile says something very clear, and it is best stated straight away to avoid the most likely misreading: what your answers describe is not a lack of personal resources, it is a lack of access. This test measures neither your efforts nor your willpower; it measures what you can actually draw on. And your two lowest scores — taking care of yourself, and turning to support — both concern external conditions: time, energy, a practical possibility of asking. Your highest score, by contrast, concerns what you carry within you. The gap between the two is the dominant feature of your profile.
This imbalance has a direct consequence for how to read this report. All the recommendations that circulate about this period — pace yourself, sleep more, move, reduce your stress — presuppose room to manoeuvre that your answers indicate does not exist. Hearing them in your situation does not produce help: it produces an additional sense of failure. This is the double penalty of this phase, and it is very widespread among women of your age, who go through perimenopause at the exact moment when professional and family responsibilities are at their peak. Attributing to a lack of discipline what stems from a saturated schedule leads you to look for the solution in the wrong place.
Your capacity to work with the discomforts, also low, deserves a particular reading. It stems partly from the lack of room to manoeuvre, but also from a property of this specific phase: unpredictability. Cycles shift, nights alternate with no logic, brain fog comes and goes. It is hard to work with what you cannot anticipate, and the usual strategies — planning ahead, making adjustments — presuppose a regularity that is missing here. It may therefore be that part of what you experience as an inability is a characteristic of the period rather than a characteristic of you.
What makes this picture movable comes down to two points. The first is the bedrock formed by your inner supports: perspective, a way of talking to yourself that does not weigh you down, things that matter and that hold. The second is your very high willingness to understand and to talk, including to a professional — a rare position at a stage where many consider that "it isn't menopause yet" and that there is therefore nothing to ask for.
This report does not tell you how you ought to be going through this period. It offers a reading of what your answers sketch at a specific moment, and it points to a priority that is not the one you will be offered elsewhere: before trying to take better care of yourself, the point is probably to check what can be treated. Sleep, disabling hot flushes, pain, very irregular cycles: these are legitimate reasons to consult, and many of them can be managed straightforwardly.
Overall result
Partial accessYou have access to a few levers, when conditions allow it — and this last statement carries the essence of your profile. This test does not measure your efforts, nor your willpower, nor your merit: it measures what you can actually draw on to get through this period more easily. And your answers describe a very unbalanced situation. What you carry within you — your perspective, the way you talk to yourself, what matters to you — is solid and forms your main point of support. What comes from outside, on the other hand, is almost entirely closed off: no time, no available energy, and turning to support costs you more than it relieves you. In other words, you are holding on mainly through your own means, in a context that leaves you almost no others. This is not a shortcoming on your part. It is a problem of access, and a problem of access is not solved by making more effort.
Partial access
4 dimensions to strengthen, 1 strength
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Time, energy or room to breathe are genuinely lacking. Taking care of yourself systematically comes after everything else — not out of neglect, but because nothing ever frees up.
This is the lowest score in your entire profile, and it matters to read it correctly, because it is very easy to read it backwards. This dimension does not assess whether you take care of yourself: it assesses whether you can. Your answers describe a saturated daily life, where professional and family obligations leave no gaps, and where whatever energy remains at the end of the day has already been spent. In such a context, a low score says nothing about your relationship with yourself; it describes a schedule. This distinction is decisive because this period almost always comes with the opposite injunction. Women in perimenopause are told to go easy on themselves, to sleep more, to move, to eat differently, to reduce their stress — as though the obstacle were ignorance or a lack of motivation.
It rarely is. The obstacle is almost always material: a day with no free hour, responsibilities that cannot be delegated, and a fatigue that makes anything requiring organization costly. The result is a double penalty, in which the sense of going about it badly is added to the exhaustion. One remark nevertheless deserves your attention, and it opens up a possibility: in a daily life of this kind, what remains accessible is never what requires an hour and some preparation. It is what fits into five minutes and requires no planning. Many women conclude that they have access to nothing because they only count what looks like an identifiable activity.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Faced with the discomforts of this period, you have few means at your disposal and often feel helpless in the moment. There is some room to manoeuvre, but it is narrow.
Your answers describe a reduced capacity to do something about discomforts when they arise: you know they will come back, you endure them more than you work with them, and the sense of not knowing how to handle them dominates. This low score is partly explained by the previous one — working with a discomfort presupposes some room to manoeuvre, and your daily life leaves almost none — but it also stems from something specific to perimenopause: unpredictability. Unlike established menopause, this phase is characterized by variations without regularity. Cycles shift, nights are good then bad for no apparent reason, brain fog comes and goes.
And it is hard to work with what you cannot anticipate: the strategies that usually work — planning ahead, making adjustments, pacing yourself in advance — presuppose precisely the regularity that is missing. It may therefore be that part of what you experience as a personal inability is in fact a property of this phase. This is a hypothesis, to be weighed against your own experience. One point deserves to be stated plainly: some of the discomforts of this period can be treated, and treated well. Sleep disturbances, disabling hot flushes, pain, intimate discomfort or very irregular bleeding are perfectly legitimate reasons to consult a doctor, a gynaecologist or a midwife. Trying to endure them better is not the only option available, and it is not necessarily the best one.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
You have real inner supports: perspective, a way of talking to yourself that does not weigh you down, and things that matter and hold you steady. This is the bedrock of your profile.
This is the highest score in your profile apart from your willingness to talk about it, and it entirely changes how the others should be read. Your answers describe someone who keeps her perspective on what she is going through, who knows how to talk to herself with a certain gentleness when the day has been bad, and who maintains a clear relationship with what matters to her. These three elements are well-documented resources, and their presence probably explains why you are holding on in such a constrained context. This point deserves to be underlined, because it is easy to miss on a quick reading: your low scores all concern external resources — time, means, support. Your high score concerns what you carry within you.
In other words, it is not your capacity that is lacking, it is the context in which it has to operate. This configuration is markedly more favorable than the reverse: solid inner supports in a closed context unfold as soon as the context opens up a little, whereas a favorable context never compensates for the absence of supports. One nuance nevertheless deserves your attention, and it constitutes the main risk of your profile. Such a gap means that you are holding on alone, essentially through your own means, and that works — up to a point. Perimenopause frequently lasts several years, and a resource drawn on relentlessly gets depleted, not abruptly but by wear. Your inner supports are a bedrock, they are not an inexhaustible reserve.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
There are people around you, but turning to them costs you more than it relieves you. Help is not absent: it is hard to mobilize.
This low score describes a situation that must be distinguished from genuine isolation, because the two are not addressed in the same way. Your answers do not sketch a non-existent circle of people: they sketch a recourse that costs. Asking means explaining, explaining takes energy, and energy is precisely what this period makes scarce. Added to this is a difficulty specific to perimenopause, and it is a considerable one: what you are going through has no clear name. Menopause is identified, it can be named, it can be dated. Perimenopause, by contrast, is a blurred, often long phase in which you are no longer quite in one mode of functioning and not yet in another, and where the manifestations are scattered — sleep, mood, memory, cycles, energy.
Asking for support for something that has no name is mechanically harder, because you have to start by establishing that something is actually happening. Many women give up at exactly this point, and conclude that they have no one when in fact they have mostly given up on explaining. A second factor appears in your answers: asking costs you in itself, independently of fatigue. It may be that you have long occupied the position of the one people turn to, which makes the reverse movement awkward. This reading is offered to you as a line of enquiry to weigh against your own experience. If it resonates, the lever is not to find support — it exists — but to lower the cost of turning to it, which comes down above all to the size of the request.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
You are seeking to understand what you are going through and you consider yourself entitled to talk about it, including to a professional. This is what makes this picture movable.
This is the highest score in your profile, and it forms a striking contrast with your actual use of support, which is low. This gap is in itself the most useful piece of information in this whole report. It indicates that what you lack is neither conviction, nor legitimacy, nor willingness: it is practical possibility. You recognize that what you are living has a real impact on your daily life, you want to understand it, and you consider yourself entitled to talk about it to a professional. That is not a widespread position at this stage.
Perimenopause is particularly badly served on this point: because it precedes menopause proper, it is frequently treated as an insubstantial prelude, including by the women going through it. "It isn't menopause yet" then serves as an argument for not consulting, when this is precisely the phase in which the manifestations are the most unstable and often the most disruptive. That you do not reason this way is a real advantage. What remains is to convert this willingness into action, and the main obstacle is probably not psychological: it is the time and energy that making an appointment requires in an already saturated daily life. Naming this obstacle for what it is — logistical and not motivational — is the surest way not to hold yourself responsible for it.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Three connections stand out in your profile, and the first is the most structuring: your inner supports are high while your access to external resources is low, on both of the dimensions concerned. This contrast is not a contradiction, it is a signature. It describes a person who holds on through her own means in a context that offers her almost no others. This configuration is markedly more favorable than the reverse — solid supports unfold as soon as the context opens up a little — but it carries a specific risk: a resource drawn on relentlessly wears out. Over a phase that frequently lasts several years, complete self-reliance is not a sustainable regime.
The second connection links your two lowest scores: taking care of yourself, and turning to support. They vary together, and for a reason that is not trivial — both presuppose considering that your own need justifies devoting something to it. Time, in one case; someone else's availability, in the other. It may be that the common factor is not fatigue but the place your needs occupy in the order of priorities. This hypothesis can be tested simply: if a window frees up, does it go to you, or to something else?
The third connection is the most telling, because it sets against each other two dimensions that ought to go together: your willingness to talk about it is high, your actual use of support is low. This gap rules out several explanations from the outset — this is neither denial, nor doubt about your legitimacy, nor a refusal of help. What is missing is of the order of practical possibility: the time to make an appointment, the energy to explain, someone to talk to with whom you would not have to go back over everything from the beginning. Nothing in this picture describes a closed circle: the obstacles identified are material, and material obstacles are the ones you can overcome most concretely.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — secure with very marked self-reliance
Nervous system state — prolonged mobilization, with few windows of recovery
Cognitive pattern — Disqualifying the positive
Cognitive pattern — Mental filter
Cognitive pattern — Fortune telling
Early schema — Punitiveness / self-severity
Early schema — Social Isolation
Early schema — Negativity and pessimism
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Cross-cutting reading frameworks
Self-efficacy (Bandura)
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Emotion regulation (Gross)
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Young's early maladaptive schemas
Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
We must begin by ruling out the most likely misreading, because it determines everything else: what your answers describe is not a difficulty in taking care of yourself, it is a practical impossibility of doing so. This test measures neither your efforts, nor your willpower, nor your discipline. It measures what you can actually draw on to get through this period. Your two lowest scores both concern external resources — time, energy, the concrete possibility of asking. Your highest score concerns what you carry within you. This gap is the signature of your profile, and it directs the reading in a very precise direction: it is not your capacity that is at fault, it is the context in which it has to operate.
This imbalance is particularly badly served by everything that is said about this period. The recommendations are the same everywhere — sleep more, move, pace yourself, reduce your stress, take time for yourself — and they all presuppose room to manoeuvre. In a day with no gaps, they do not work as advice: they work as a reminder of what you are failing to do. This is the double penalty of this phase, and it strikes precisely those women who go through it at the moment when professional and family responsibilities peak. It is important to name this clearly, because the opposite attribution is very costly: concluding that you are going about it badly when you are simply short of time means adding guilt to exhaustion, and depriving yourself of the only useful action — looking at where different conditions might come from.
A second thread concerns your difficulty in working with the discomforts, and it stems from a property of this phase that is underestimated: unpredictability. Established menopause has at least the constancy of its state; perimenopause does not. Cycles shift, nights alternate with no logic, brain fog comes and goes. And the strategies usually available — anticipating, making adjustments, pacing yourself in advance — presuppose a regularity that is missing here. It may therefore be that part of what you experience as a personal inability is a characteristic of the period. That does not make the situation easier, but it changes the conclusion you draw about yourself.
Alongside these constraints, your profile contains a bedrock that it would be a shame not to name, all the more so as it is likely that you do not count it as a resource. You keep your perspective on what you are going through. You know how to talk to yourself with a certain gentleness when the week has been bad. You maintain a clear relationship with what matters to you. These three elements probably explain why you are holding on in such a closed context, and they look like nothing spectacular, which is exactly why they go unnoticed. One remark, however, and it is the main risk of your profile: such a gap means that you are holding on alone. That works, up to a point. Perimenopause frequently lasts several years, and a resource drawn on relentlessly wears out — slowly, and therefore without your seeing the moment when it gives way.
Turning to support deserves a reading of its own here, because it is easy to confuse it with isolation. Your answers do not describe an absent circle of people: they describe a recourse that costs. And the main cost is not the asking, it is the explaining. Perimenopause has no clear name, its manifestations are scattered, and you often do not know yourself how to refer to it. Asking for support therefore means first establishing that something is actually happening, which requires an energy that this period makes scarce. Many women give up at exactly that point, and conclude that they have no one when in fact they have mostly given up on starting from the beginning.
What makes this picture movable is the most striking contrast in your profile: your willingness to understand and to talk is very high, your actual recourse is low. This gap rules out from the outset denial, doubt about your legitimacy and a refusal of help. What is missing is of the order of practical possibility, and that is by far the best obstacle to have, because it can be lifted by concrete means. The priority that emerges is, moreover, not the one you will be offered elsewhere. Before seeking to take better care of yourself, the point is no doubt to check what can be treated: sleep disturbances, disabling hot flushes in a work setting, pain and very irregular cycles are perfectly legitimate reasons to consult. The sign that something is shifting will not be spectacular: it will be more like noticing, on a Tuesday at ten past one, that the quarter-hour walk took place — and recognizing that quarter-hour for what it is, not a victory over yourself, but a condition that has finally opened up.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Taking care of yourself
Working with the discomforts
Inner supports
Turning to support
Willingness to talk about it
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I feel surrounded in the face of what I'm going through.
Answer : Moderately
You answered "Moderately". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I can give myself what supports my physical wellbeing.
Answer : A little
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I can find respite from the discomforts.
Answer : Moderately
4. I can step back from what I'm going through.
Answer : A little
5. I allow myself not to carry everything alone.
Answer : Moderately
6. I can spare my body when fatigue sets in.
Answer : A little
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page