An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Tension before the act · Relief after the act · Non-utilitarian nature · Loss of control and guilt · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Léa,
The profile your answers sketch about your mother, Monique, is characterised by broadly moderate scores, with a particular pattern: pre-act tension and the non-utilitarian character of the acts seem low for her, while relief after the act and loss of control with guilt sit, according to you, at a moderate level. This combination doesn't paint a typical clinical picture of kleptomania, but rather suggests Monique may, in certain circumstances, use impulsive acts to regulate emotions or tensions, with some ambivalence on her part. The relief she seems to gain would quietly reinforce the behaviour, while the guilt that follows signals these acts may clash with her own values. Your own readiness, still at pre-contemplation, indicates you don't yet know how to approach the situation — a perfectly valid position, whether you've only recently noticed these gestures or have been watching them for a while without knowing how to react. Even so, these moderate traits deserve compassionate observation from you, since everyday stress could accentuate them for her. Remember these results are only indicators drawn from YOUR observations and YOUR reading of the situation, and they replace neither professional advice nor your mother's actual experience, which you don't have direct access to. If uncertainties remain, a one-off consultation — for you, for her if she's open to it, or for both of you — could offer personalised insight, with no obligation attached.
It may be that the moderate relief you observe in her after the act, even without intense tension beforehand, works as a quick attempt to ease a diffuse discomfort that belongs to her, but that the guilt which seems to follow immediately reignites that need, creating a cycle neither she nor you may have fully measured yet. This crossing of what looks like a real inner conflict for her and your own current ambivalence about stepping in suggests you're both, each in your own way, at a turning point where, without rushing, naming what you observe could become a shared compass.
Overall result
Moderate traitsSeveral moderate traits emerge from the profile your answers sketch about your mother, Monique. Some dimensions — the tension beforehand, the relief afterward, how non-utilitarian the acts seem, or the loss of control — appear, from what you describe, to show up intermittently rather than dominating her day-to-day functioning. Clinically, this moderate level suggests that mechanisms linked to stealing urges can activate in specific contexts without forming, as far as you can tell, a self-sustaining, pervasive cycle. Recognised approaches such as CBT stress the value of early support before such traits consolidate — something you might, if you choose, gently bring up with her.
Moderate traits
2 dimensions to strengthen, 3 strengths
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
The "Tension before the act" facet appears low in what you describe about Monique. Clinically, this build-up of hard-to-contain internal pressure is one of the central markers of the impulsive cycle described in reference classifications (DSM-5, ICD-11 type). Its apparent scarcity suggests that this psychic build-up does not seem, from what you can see, to structure her relationship to urges or to acting on them. This is one marker among others, best read with caution since you only have access to what shows on the outside.
The low score your answers suggest here means that, from what you observe in Monique, an internal pressure building up before a gesture doesn't seem to be a dominant mechanism. That doesn't mean she feels no tension at all — you can't know that from the inside — but rather that what you can see doesn't match the characteristic build-up described in the clinical literature.
What you're attributing to her here also says something about your own reading of the situation: perhaps you sense her gestures as more impulsive than premeditated, which could explain why they feel so hard to anticipate. It's worth noting that this apparent calm coexists, in your answers, with a moderate relief afterward for her: this may suggest the act doesn't respond to a pre-existing tension but to other emotional needs you only partly perceive. This reading remains a hypothesis, to be weighed against what you know of her.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The "Relief after the act" facet shows up moderately in what you describe about Monique. This relief — a sense of release, letting go, or easing felt after acting — can function as a subtle but real reinforcement of the impulsive cycle. It's particularly active in contexts of stress or accumulated tension, where the act becomes a substitute form of emotional regulation. Recognised approaches such as CBT stress that understanding this reinforcement mechanism is essential to keep a cycle from automating and gradually intensifying.
Your answers suggest that Monique seems to feel, at times, marked relief after certain impulsive acts — which can act as a subtle reinforcer of the behaviour. This mechanism of emotional regulation through action is well documented: without alternative strategies, it's not unusual for a behaviour to take hold precisely because it brings quick relief.
From what you observe, this relief seems to coexist with a moderate loss of control and a guilt that follows, creating for her a setup where the immediate ease clashes with her own values. What concerns you here isn't trivial: gaining more clarity on what, for her, precedes this need for relief — boredom, frustration, tiredness — could help you understand the situation without taking on the job of fixing it for her.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The "Non-utilitarian character" facet appears low in what you describe. Clinically, taking objects one doesn't need, without financial or practical motive, is a central distinguishing marker in reference classifications (DSM-5, ICD-11 type), setting the kleptomanic impulse apart from deliberate behaviour. Its scarcity in what you observe suggests this specific mechanism doesn't seem to structure Monique's relationship to objects or urges. It's one indicator to weigh within an overall reading, without drawing a final conclusion from it.
The low score on "Non-utilitarian character" indicates that, from what you can see, the objects involved seem to hold some perceived use for her, even if relative. Clinically, the absence of this distinctive dimension moves the profile you describe away from a typical kleptomanic pattern, where stealing items with no personal value is central.
This reinforces the idea that her impulses may be more tied to practical, symbolic, or contextual emotional needs than to a specific impulse-control disorder. It may be worth watching whether, in moments of vulnerability for her, the line between useful and useless blurs. This reading remains a possibility you're free to set aside if it doesn't match what you know of her.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The "Loss of control and guilt" facet shows up moderately in what you describe about Monique. This trait brings together two linked components: an intermittent sense, for her, of not being able to hold back the urge, and guilt or shame appearing after the act. At this level, this gap between intention and behaviour settles into certain contexts without dominating her overall functioning. Clinical psychology research highlights that this tension between personal values and impulsive acts can generate, for the person involved, quiet but real distress — and for the loved one watching, an equally real worry.
Your answers suggest Monique goes through episodes where her sense of control over her actions seems to slip partially, followed by guilt that can weigh on her — and be visible to you. This tension between her values and her impulsive actions deserves your compassionate attention, because even moderate, it can wear down emotionally over time, for her and for you as a witness.
It's worth noting that what you observe here coexists with a moderate relief, which may create an inner conflict for her: the act brings immediate relief, but the regret that follows may erode the esteem she holds for herself in those moments. Your own worry, meanwhile, is legitimate — you don't need to play it down just because it's "not that serious".
Recommendations and concrete exercises
These questions measure YOUR readiness to act on this situation — not Monique's, which you can't measure on her behalf. Your score indicates you're not yet fully convinced of the need to step in or raise the subject openly — which is a valid stage of the process. Awareness always comes before decision. Your report helps you clarify what's at stake for you.
Your score sits at the pre-contemplation stage: you're not yet fully convinced of the need or usefulness of acting on what you observe in your mother — whether that's speaking to her directly, seeking outside advice, or simply continuing to watch. This is a normal stage, where your own awareness of the situation is still forming.
Given the moderate but non-pervasive picture your answers paint, it's understandable that no urgency to act is felt yet. This stance can be protective: it keeps you from rushing into a conversation or a decision you don't yet feel ready to have. Staying open to observation, without pressure, can help you catch an escalation early — in her and in your own discomfort with the situation.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The absence of strong pre-act tension in Monique contrasts with moderate relief, which may indicate her impulsive acts aren't underpinned by a build-up of internal tension but perhaps by immediate emotional-regulation needs, like boredom or passing frustration — hypotheses you can only confirm from the outside. The moderate relief acts as a reinforcer, paired for her with intermittent loss of control and post-act guilt, creating a cycle where the act soothes temporarily but stirs up regret.
The low non-utilitarian score suggests her impulses concern objects or situations that hold some use in her eyes, which makes the behaviour less "gratuitous" and so potentially less visible to those around her. This fairly consistent profile suggests these mechanisms are, for now, isolated for her and don't feed on themselves intensely. Even so, this same balance could be disrupted by stress factors affecting her, subtly reinforcing the relief-guilt-loss of control cycle. Your own awareness of these links, even at this stage where you don't yet know how to act, is a first step towards an eventual decision to raise the question, if and when you choose, at your own pace.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — sympathetic (mobilisation) with incomplete ventral relief, observed in the person described
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Impulses and self-control
The impulsive-act cycle
Sources: Gratz & Roemer (2004)
Self-control model (Baumeister)
Sources: Baumeister, Heatherton & Tice (1994)
Emotion regulation (Gross)
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Cross-cutting reading grids
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
What stands out in what you describe is an almost inverted pattern from what one might expect: the tension before the act seems muted in Monique, almost absent, as if the gesture didn't spring from an unbearable surge of anxiety but from more neutral ground. Yet relief follows, clear enough to picture as a balm on something vaguer for her — a faint discomfort, weariness, or perhaps a fleeting sense of regaining the upper hand over something. This relief seems, from your answers, to be the quiet hinge of the pattern: without strong prior tension in view, it's what gives the act meaning for her, what makes it "worthwhile", because it offers a quick shift in state. The guilt that follows, itself moderate, shows this relief doesn't leave her at peace; it acts as a reminder of her own values, a dissonance between the person she wants to be and the one who, for a moment, chose something else. Altogether this sketches a gentle but real loop — and you, as a witness, carry part of its emotional weight without having control over it.
This pattern likely makes some things easier for her: she doesn't seem overwhelmed by massive anxiety before acting, which may give her a sense of inner freedom. The act, when it happens, doesn't seem to drain her; it seems instead to offer a small, accessible, almost self-administered dose of relief. The price she pays, though, lies elsewhere: the moderate guilt confronts her with a contradiction that can wear at her silently, and the loss of control she seems to feel may chip away at her self-trust. On your side, what you observe creates its own burden: the worry of not knowing how to help, the difficulty telling a benign habit apart from something that could worsen, and, at times, the feeling of carrying this watchfulness alone.
When trying to understand the story that may have led here, only guesses are possible, to be held with care — you only have partial access to her experience. One possibility: this behaviour may have served, at some point in her life, as a regulator when words or feelings were too tangled for her to untangle. Perhaps in a daily life where certain responsibilities or loneliness weigh on her, granting herself a small "discreet relief" became a quick way to regain a sense of control. This pattern may have taken root in an environment where personal needs came second, or where little was shown about easing a sense of emptiness without a concrete act. It may never have been, for her, about greed or an uncontrollable craving, but about carving out a secret breathing space.
What seems underestimated in this situation is, first, your own position as an attentive observer: the simple fact that you noticed these gestures and took the time to describe them here shows caring vigilance, not intrusion. The muted tension beforehand in her is also, in a sense, a resource: it suggests she isn't in a constant state of alarm, which leaves room for a calm conversation rather than a crisis. The guilt she seems to feel is also a signal: it points to a well-anchored set of values in her, an inner compass that keeps working even when the behaviour slips past it. It isn't an enemy to fight in her, but a possible foothold for a conversation, if and when you feel ready to have it.
If something were to shift first, it likely wouldn't be a confrontation, but a slight change in your own view of the situation. Your current readiness sits at "pre-contemplation": you don't yet know how to act, and you're fully entitled to take the time you need. The first concrete sign of movement, on your side, wouldn't necessarily be a conversation with her, but a simple inner clarification: at what point, for you, would this situation become concerning enough for you to act differently? This small step of reflection, with no pressure attached, would show you're reclaiming the part of this story that's actually yours to carry — without taking on the part that belongs to Monique.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Tension before the act
Relief after the act
Non-utilitarian character
Loss of control and guilt
Readiness to act
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. She seems to feel a rising tension before taking something.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
You answered "Somewhat disagree". Can you tell me a bit more about when you've noticed this in her?
It mostly shows when she's under pressure or upset about something else, I think — not when she's calm.
2. Afterward, her relief quickly gives way to a visible unease.
Answer : Neutral
And how long have you noticed this in her?
It's been more present these last few months, though thinking back, I believe I'd seen it before without really paying attention.
3. She seems to feel guilty or ashamed after these moments.
Answer : Neutral
4. She hides, gives away, or gets rid of what she took.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
5. Taking something doesn't seem to feel like a challenge or a game for her.
Answer : Somewhat agree
6. Taking something doesn't seem to bring her any visible relief or pleasure.
Answer : Neutral
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Léa's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page