An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 6 dimensions
Rejection Wound · Abandonment Wound · Humiliation Wound · Betrayal Wound · Injustice Wound · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile shows moderately active childhood wounds with a distinctive pattern: two significantly active wounds (abandonment and betrayal, both at 60%) surrounded by three moderate wounds (rejection, humiliation, and injustice, all at 40%). This constellation suggests a relational and emotional landscape shaped primarily by concerns about loss and untrustworthiness, with secondary vulnerabilities around shame and perfectionism. At 36 years old, you are navigating adult relationships, career, and likely significant life responsibilities with a nervous system that remains somewhat organized around preventing abandonment and betrayal. What your profile indicates is not a pervasive psychological fragility, but rather a specific set of sensitivities that, while requiring attention, coexist with demonstrated resilience (the absence of 'very high' scores suggests you have built adaptive capacities). The moderate wounds alongside the high ones suggest that you are not entirely dominated by any single pattern; there is flexibility available.
However, the presence of two high wounds simultaneously suggests they may reinforce each other: abandonment fears may fuel hypervigilance and control (betrayal protection), and betrayal vigilance may create distance that paradoxically triggers abandonment fears. This cycle, if present in your experience, can feel exhausting and may create relational friction despite your good intentions. The clinical nature of this assessment does not mean you 'have a disorder,' but rather that these are patterns worth understanding and working with intentionally, particularly given your age and likely relational investments. Your gender context as a woman is relevant here: societal conditioning around caretaking, people-pleasing, and responsiveness may have intensified these wounds, or made them easier to rationalize as 'just how women are supposed to be.' This underscores the importance of distinguishing between your authentic relational style and reactive patterns driven by old wounds.
Overall result
Moderately Active WoundsYour answers suggest that some core childhood wounds could be moderately active and occasionally influence your behaviors, your emotional reactions, and your relational dynamics. Clinically, protective masks — fleeing, dependent, masochistic, controlling, or rigid — would seem to manifest in specific contexts, particularly those that recall early experiences of vulnerability. These situational activations, though manageable in daily life, can generate repetitive tensions or relational misunderstandings that deserve caring attention. This identification constitutes a useful invitation to deepen your knowledge of yourself and your mechanisms.
Moderately Active Wounds
5 dimensions to strengthen
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Tendency to feel rejected, to flee social situations, and to develop the fleeing mask.
Your answers suggest that the rejection wound may be moderately activated in certain contexts of your life. Clinically, this can translate into moments where you anticipate rejection without objective evidence, where you fade into the background in groups, or hesitate to express your needs for fear of being seen as undesirable.
The protective mechanism of the fleeing mask would manifest situationally rather than permanently, often reactivated by dynamics that recall early experiences of not belonging. This ambivalence between the desire for connection and the fear of being pushed away can generate relational fatigue and a tendency toward occasional self-criticism.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Fear of being abandoned, emotional dependency, and development of the dependent mask.
Your answers suggest that the abandonment wound may be significantly present and notably influence your relationships and behaviors. Clinically, the dependent mechanism appears active on a regular basis: intense seeking of validation and presence, difficulty tolerating solitude, a tendency to forget yourself to maintain the bond, or to cling to relationships even when unsatisfying.
These behaviors are often linked to an early attachment insecurity that instilled the conviction that the other is necessary for emotional survival. Clinical psychology research emphasizes that these patterns can be worked through effectively with appropriate support.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Feelings of shame, tendency to forget oneself for others, and development of the masochistic mask.
Your answers suggest that the humiliation wound may be moderately activated in certain contexts. Clinically, this can translate into episodes of shame or guilt that hinder self-care, a situational tendency to come after others' needs, or a difficulty setting boundaries without feeling disproportionate guilt.
The masochistic mechanism would manifest intermittently, often reactivated by situations where your needs seem to compete with those of others. These dynamics, when they accumulate, can generate progressive emotional and physical fatigue and harm your overall well-being.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Need for control, difficulty trusting, and development of the controlling mask.
Your answers suggest that the betrayal wound may be significantly present and notably structure your relationships and your relationship with the other. Clinically, the controlling mechanism appears active on a regular basis: a marked need to master situations and people, difficulty delegating or trusting without trying to verify, and chronic distrust toward others' intentions.
These behaviors, though protective in appearance, often generate significant relational tensions and an internal exhaustion linked to constant vigilance. They generally find their origin in early experiences where trust was significantly violated.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Perfectionism, emotional rigidity, and development of the rigid mask.
Your answers suggest that the injustice wound may be moderately activated in certain contexts of your life. Clinically, this can manifest as situational perfectionism, occasional rigidity in your relationship with rules or expectations, a tendency to cut off your emotions to maintain control in difficult situations, or a heightened sensitivity to what seems unjust or unbalanced.
The rigid mechanism would activate intermittently, often in high-stakes professional or relational contexts. This defensive mobilization, though understandable, can progressively generate fatigue and emotional impoverishment.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your abandonment and betrayal wounds, both at 60%, appear to form a reinforcing dyad that warrants attention. Abandonment anxiety (needing constant reassurance and presence) can trigger the defensive response of the betrayal wound (controlling, hypervigilant, risk-averse), which then creates distance and withdrawal in others—ironically increasing the risk of the very abandonment you fear. Conversely, when betrayal vigilance relaxes briefly and you move toward connection, abandonment fears may intensify the pressure to maintain that connection 'perfectly,' driving a cycle of emotional exhaustion and relational friction. A possible mechanism at play is that your nervous system may have learned early that people are both unreliable (betrayal) and essential (abandonment), creating a bind: needing others while fearing their untrustworthiness simultaneously.
The three moderate wounds (rejection, humiliation, injustice) appear to function as secondary amplifiers of this central dyad: perfectionism and rigidity can serve the betrayal wound (control through excellence) and paradoxically the abandonment wound (if I am perfect, no one will leave); shame and guilt reduce your willingness to voice needs or set boundaries, intensifying abandonment pressure; and rejection sensitivity may sharpen your hypervigilance for signs of disloyalty. The positive dimension of this pattern is that it is relatively integrated around a coherent set of fears, which means that addressing the two high wounds through targeted work is likely to have a cascading calming effect on the entire profile. You are not fragmented across multiple disconnected struggles; your wounds tell a story that your mind and nervous system are working hard to tell you.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Attachment style — anxious with avoidant features
Nervous system state — sympathetic hyperactivation with dorsal collapse risk
Cognitive pattern — catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — personalization
Early schema — Abandonment/Instability
Early schema — Defectiveness/Shame
Early schema — Mistrust/Abuse
Attachment — Sources: Bowlby (1969) ; Ainsworth et al. (1978) ; Hazan & Shaver (1987)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Trauma and early wounds
Disorganized attachment
Sources: Main & Solomon (1990) ; Liotti (2004)
Window of tolerance (Siegel)
Sources: Siegel (1999) ; Ogden, Minton & Pain (2006)
The Body Keeps the Score (van der Kolk)
Sources: van der Kolk (2014)
Stages of recovery (Herman)
Sources: Herman (1992)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Young's early maladaptive schemas
Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Your profile paints a picture of a person whose emotional life is quietly dominated by two powerful, intertwined fears: the fear of being left behind, and the fear of being taken advantage of. These are not abstract ideas for you; they are visceral and shape how you move through the world. What makes your particular constellation interesting is that while abandonment and betrayal wounds are loudly present, the other three wounds—rejection, humiliation, and injustice—sit in a moderate range. This suggests that you are not a person who is chronically overwhelmed in every relational domain. Instead, there is a kind of hierarchy to your sensitivities. Abandonment and betrayal appear to be the primary architects, while the other three often function as their emotional foot soldiers. For instance, a fear of humiliation can arise not just from any embarrassment, but specifically from being exposed as needy or “too much” in a way that might drive someone away. A heightened attention to injustice might surface most sharply when you feel someone has broken a promise, which resonates with betrayal. Even rejection, which sits at the same moderate level, might sting most when it echoes the larger terror of being discarded. The moderate scores, then, are not separate problems; they are the textured expressions of your two core concerns. This configures a relational stance that is simultaneously deeply loyal and perpetually guarded.
The internal tension this creates can be profound. On one hand, you likely bring remarkable strengths to your relationships: a fierce commitment to reliability, an almost radar-like capacity to sense when something is off in a connection, and a genuine desire to be a safe harbor for others because you know how it feels to lack one. You probably show up consistently, pay attention to the fine print of promises, and value trust above almost everything. These are not small qualities. On the other hand, this same vigilance can become exhausting and costly. The effort it takes to constantly scan for signs of impending loss or duplicity is like holding a weight that never fully rests. It can make relaxing into love, friendship, or collaboration feel like a risk rather than a refuge. You might find yourself caught in a bind: wanting to lean fully into a relationship but bracing for the other shoe to drop. This tension can manifest as over-giving to secure attachment, or as a subtle hesitation to let people truly in, because to trust fully would mean lowering a guard that has kept you safe for decades. The cost is a certain loneliness even in connection, and a fatigue that comes from the never-ending checks and balances you run in the background of your mind.
So how did such a finely tuned system come to be? At some point in your story, likely early on, it was not safe to assume that people would stay, or that they would be honest. This is not about blaming anyone; it is about recognizing that your nervous system learned a vital lesson in a world where abandonment or betrayal was a real possibility—perhaps through actual losses, broken promises, or an environment where emotional safety was inconsistent. The high sensitivities you feel now are the echoes of that learning. They served a profound protective function: by being hyper-aware of the first whispers of disconnect or dishonesty, you could brace yourself or act to prevent the full pain of being blindsided. At 36, you carry that young, adaptive wisdom with you. The problem is not that you learned these patterns, but that they may now be applying themselves to situations where the threat level is much lower than it once was. The person who cancels plans last minute might not be abandoning you; the colleague who forgot a detail might not be betraying your trust. Yet your internal alarm system, forged in more dangerous emotional terrain, can still react as if they are.
Amid this landscape, there is a resource you may not fully appreciate: the very moderation of your other wounds. The fact that rejection, humiliation, and injustice do not consume you at an extreme level suggests a core resilience that has not been swallowed by your primary fears. It hints that you have developed ways to hold humiliation with some perspective, to weather rejection without complete collapse, and to fight injustice without becoming a constant crusader. This flexibility is like a set of shock absorbers. They allow you to stay in the arena of relationships even when things are imperfect. Think of it this way: while your abandonment and betrayal fears might be yelling, these moderate parts of you are quietly keeping the car on the road. They are evidence that you have not given up, that you still engage, that you still hope. That hope is a renewable resource, even if it often gets buried under the louder voices.
If something were to shift, it might first happen around the betrayal wound. This wound often operates on a cognitive level—it’s a story you tell yourself about how people will eventually let you down. Because stories can be edited, even slightly, there is room for experimentation. The first sign of movement could be a moment where you catch yourself not assuming the worst. For instance, your partner or a close friend does something ambiguous, and instead of your mind instantly constructing a narrative of deception, there is a pause—a small gap where another possibility, however faint, is allowed to exist. You might notice that you didn’t immediately feel that familiar, jolting need to protect yourself. That gap is the concrete sign. It may be tiny, lasting only a few seconds, but it represents your system beginning to question whether today’s world is identical to yesterday’s. And if nothing terrible happens in that gap, that single positive data point can start to build a new reference library for your nervous system. You are not broken, nor are you stuck. You are a person who has built an intricate, intelligent, and costly adaptation to a difficult past. And in that very intelligence lies your capacity to, little by little, rewrite the code. You already have the self-awareness to even take this test and reflect on it; that is not the action of someone who is powerless over their patterns. It’s the action of someone ready to gently expand the possibilities of what relationships can feel like.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Rejection Wound
Abandonment Wound
Humiliation Wound
Betrayal Wound
Injustice Wound
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I feel at ease in groups and social gatherings.
Answer : Somewhat agree
You answered "Somewhat agree". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I tend to isolate myself when I feel bad or misunderstood.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I often doubt my right to exist or take my place.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
4. I feel panicked at the idea of being rejected by someone I love.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
5. I allow myself to take my place, even at the risk of being criticized.
Answer : Somewhat agree
6. As a child, I felt like I wasn't wanted or welcome.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 6 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page