An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Re-experiencing · Avoidance · Hyperarousal · Negative cognitions · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall post-traumatic stress profile is moderate in global intensity, but the pattern of your scores reveals a particular configuration that warrants careful attention. You are experiencing intrusive re-experiencing and hyperarousal at moderate levels, but avoidance and negative cognitions are significantly elevated at 60%. This pattern suggests that your primary coping strategy has been psychological and behavioral withdrawal—avoiding trauma reminders and gradually internalizing beliefs that limit your sense of safety and possibility. As a 36-year-old woman, you are in a life stage where career advancement, intimate relationships, and social engagement typically become more central; high avoidance and negative cognitions may be creating friction in these domains, even if you are not consciously connecting them to your trauma.
The positive aspect of your profile is that your re-experiencing and hyperarousal are not at the most severe levels, suggesting that with targeted intervention—particularly exposure-based therapy and cognitive restructuring—these dimensions may respond more readily. The central therapeutic work ahead involves gradually re-engaging with previously avoided situations and relationships, while simultaneously challenging the protective but limiting negative beliefs that trauma has installed. This is not about 'getting over it' or suppressing your experience; it is about integrating the trauma into your life narrative and reclaiming agency in how you move forward.
Overall result
Moderate PTSDYour answers suggest moderate symptoms compatible with post-traumatic stress. The event has left perceptible traces on one or more dimensions — re-experiencing, hyperarousal, negative thoughts or avoidance — that deserve attention. Clinically, this level does not mean that the disorder is fully settled, but it indicates that the natural recovery mechanisms need to be supported to prevent gradual worsening. Recognized approaches such as CBT and other trauma-centered therapies have shown their effectiveness at this stage. Psychological support, even occasional, can significantly reduce the impact of these symptoms and prevent their consolidation. This questionnaire is not a diagnosis — it points towards reflection and, if you judge it useful, towards a professional consultation.
Moderate PTSD
4 dimensions to strengthen
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Intrusive episodes in which the traumatic event is involuntarily re-experienced.
Your answers suggest that re-experiencing occurs intermittently and generates significant discomfort. These intrusions — images, memory fragments, occasional nightmares — indicate that the memory of the event has not yet been fully integrated by the central nervous system.
From a clinical standpoint, this level corresponds to a moderate activation of traumatic memory: present enough to disrupt quality of life, but without reaching the frequency or intensity that characterize a more severe picture. Targeted regulation strategies can help reduce the grip of these intrusions. Early psychological support can facilitate integration before the phenomenon settles in further.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Efforts to avoid reminders of the trauma (thoughts, places, people).
Your answers suggest that avoidance has become a central mechanism that restricts your life significantly. Places, people, thoughts, topics of conversation associated with the event are systematically circumvented, at the cost of a gradual narrowing of the space of daily life.
Clinically, avoidance is one of the most powerful maintainers of post-traumatic stress: by preventing any confrontation with the traumatic material, it deprives the nervous system of the opportunity to reprocess it and to deactivate. At this level, self-managed strategies reach their limits. Recognized approaches such as trauma-focused CBT, which include structured graded-exposure protocols, are specifically indicated. Specialized professional support is strongly recommended.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Persistent state of alertness and exaggerated startle responses.
Your answers suggest moderate signs of hyperarousal: frequent startling, irritability or sleep difficulties that begin to affect quality of life. From a clinical standpoint, this reflects an autonomic nervous system that maintains a high level of alert in response to the traces of the trauma.
The alarm system, normally transient, remains partially activated and consumes physical and emotional resources day to day. This level does not mean that the disorder is lastingly settled, but it indicates that body and mind have not yet fully released the stress response. Targeted regulation strategies can noticeably reduce these symptoms and prevent their worsening.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Persistent negative thoughts and beliefs related to the trauma.
Your answers suggest that negative cognitions are deeply anchored and intrusively color your perception of yourself, of others and of the world. These beliefs — shame, intense guilt, generalized mistrust, the feeling of being fundamentally different or damaged — are not the reflection of an objective reality: they are the product of a cognitive system reorganised by the state of traumatic alarm.
Clinically, this level of cognitive distortion sustains the disorder and represents an obstacle to spontaneous recovery. Recognized approaches such as trauma-focused CBT and EMDR work specifically on the link between traumatic memory and associated beliefs. Structured and regular therapeutic work is necessary to initiate lasting change.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your two elevated dimensions—avoidance and negative cognitions—form a reinforcing cycle that is critical to understand. Negative beliefs (e.g., 'I cannot handle this,' 'People will judge me,' 'It is not safe') drive you to avoid situations where those beliefs might be challenged or disproven. Avoidance then protects these beliefs from updating; each time you avoid, you never gather the evidence that contradicts the belief. Meanwhile, avoidance isolates you, which deepens the belief 'People do not understand' or 'I am alone.' This cycle is not malicious or conscious—it is a natural psychological protection mechanism. However, the longer it operates, the smaller your world becomes and the more entrenched the negative cognitions become.
Breaking this cycle requires simultaneous work on both dimensions: cognitive restructuring helps you see alternative interpretations of your trauma and current experiences, while gradual exposure (supported by the cognitive work) allows you to re-collect evidence that challenges the core beliefs. Additionally, your moderate hyperarousal and re-experiencing may be *sustained* by the avoidance: if you are constantly escaping threat-related stimuli, your nervous system never has the chance to learn that sitting with discomfort leads to habituation and safety. Addressing avoidance is therefore not just one element of your healing; it is the key that unlocks progress across multiple dimensions.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — Mixed sympathetic/dorsal
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — All-or-nothing thinking
Early schema — Vulnerability to Harm
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Anxiety and stress
Cognitive model of anxiety (Beck)
Sources: Beck, Emery & Greenberg (1985) ; Clark & Wells (1995)
Transactional model of stress (Lazarus)
Sources: Lazarus & Folkman (1984)
Intolerance of uncertainty
Sources: Dugas, Gagnon, Ladouceur & Freeston (1998)
Experiential avoidance
Sources: Hayes, Wilson, Gifford, Follette & Strosahl (1996)
Trauma and early wounds
The Body Keeps the Score (van der Kolk)
Sources: van der Kolk (2014)
Window of tolerance (Siegel)
Sources: Siegel (1999) ; Ogden, Minton & Pain (2006)
Stages of recovery (Herman)
Sources: Herman (1992)
Disorganised attachment
Sources: Main & Solomon (1990) ; Liotti (2004)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Young's early maladaptive schemas
Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
You arrive at these results with a global score that might seem reassuring at first glance—moderate, not severe. But the pattern tells a more nuanced story, one that perhaps you have been living without fully naming. Your mind has crafted a sophisticated equilibrium: the walls of avoidance and the weight of negative beliefs have risen to prominence, while the flames of re-experiencing and the electric hum of hyperarousal still flicker and buzz, but at a lower volume. This is not a random arrangement; it is a coherent, intelligent strategy that likely became necessary. The high avoidance and negative cognitions are the architects here, working in tandem to keep the more disruptive symptoms at a manageable distance. They have organized your internal world into a fortress—effective at dampening intrusion, but also at isolating the inhabitant.
The tension this creates is both a relief and a silent cost. On one hand, you can move through days without being constantly ambushed by memories or on high alert. Avoidance gives you a semblance of control: you steer clear of reminders, you sidestep situations that might trigger the past, and negative beliefs like “I am broken” or “The world is unsafe” serve as a preemptive strike against hope, cushioning you from further betrayal. This might have felt like the only way to survive. Yet, the ease it brings is brittle. The same walls that keep the storms out also keep you in. What becomes costly is the narrowing of your world—relationships require vulnerability, which avoidance forbids; career growth asks for risk-taking, which negative cognitions dismiss as futile; and your own inner life shrinks to a defended territory where spontaneity is suspect. At 36, a stage when many are expanding their lives, you might find yourself in subtle friction with the very domains that could nourish you, without consciously connecting the dots to a trauma that taught you that retreat was the safest option.
To understand this configuration, it helps to imagine its origin story—not to dwell on the past, but to honor what your system accomplished. This pattern often germinates when external danger was once overwhelming and inescapable. Avoidance likely began as a highly adaptive, lifesaving tactic: if you couldn’t fight or flee, you learned to hide internally, to erase the cues that announced threat. Negative cognitions might have been seeds planted by the trauma itself (“You are powerless,” “Others cannot be trusted”) that took root because they matched your experience. They became a lens that pre-emptively dims the world’s brightness, so you are never again blinded by it. Hyperarousal and re-experiencing, though distressing, are the echoes of a nervous system that hasn’t fully stood down—they signal that the system remains vigilant, even while you’ve dampened their noise. What you need to recognize is that this entire architecture was built by a younger self trying to survive, and it worked. The question now is whether it is still the right home for the person you are becoming.
Amid this pattern, there is an underestimated resource: the very fact that your re-experiencing and hyperarousal stand at a moderate level, not higher, suggests a degree of processing has already occurred, perhaps unconsciously. Your mind has not fully silenced the past; it keeps handing you fragments—images, body sensations, sudden spikes of alertness—as if to say, “This still needs attention.” That persistence is not just a symptom; it is a form of tenacity, a sign that part of you is still seeking integration rather than total amputation. Far from being a weakness, this moderate activation means that the trauma’s grip is not absolute. With the right support, these dimmer alarms can be approached not as enemies, but as messengers ready to be decoded.
What might shift first, and how would you know? Change often begins not with a grand resolution, but with a tiny recalibration in the avoidance system. Perhaps you notice yourself instinctively turning away from a thought, a place, or a conversation, and for a split second you pause. The sign that something is moving could be as simple as a subtle decrease in the urgency of that turning away—a sense that the feared catastrophe does not crash in when you just imagine staying with it for a breath longer. It might show up as a bodily sensation: a slight loosening in the chest, or a realization that the world did not collapse because you allowed a memory to exist without wrestling it down. The negative beliefs may start to crack when you find yourself inadvertently disproving one—when a small act of trust is not punished, or when you accomplish something in spite of the inner voice that insisted you couldn’t. These are not magical fixes, but they are the first threads of a new narrative, woven from lived experience rather than from the past’s brutal lessons.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Re-experiencing
Avoidance
Hyperarousal
Negative cognitions
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I have painful, involuntary memories of the traumatic event.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I have nightmares related to the traumatic event.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. I have flashbacks or feel as though I am reliving the event.
Answer : Rarely
4. Images of the event come back to me in an uncontrollable way.
Answer : Rarely
5. Certain sounds, smells, or sensations abruptly bring me back to the event.
Answer : Rarely
6. I feel intense distress when something reminds me of the event.
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page