An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Attack Frequency · Symptom Intensity · Agoraphobia · Bodily Hypervigilance · Readiness to Change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your overall profile reflects a moderate-to-high panic disorder in which the primary challenge is not the frequency of attacks but their intensity and the surrounding hypervigilance. Your results paint a pattern in which an acute nervous system response (high symptom intensity) is being reinforced by ongoing bodily attention (high hypervigilance), creating a self-sustaining cycle where you are both primed to detect danger signals and prone to misinterpreting normal sensations as threats. Your moderate levels in attack frequency and agoraphobia suggest that your life has not yet become severely restricted, which is a strength and indicates a good window for intervention.
At 36, you are at a life stage where managing this pattern has real implications for career stability, relationship quality, and personal autonomy — addressing it now can prevent the progressive narrowing of your world that sometimes accompanies untreated panic disorder. The good news is that your profile is highly responsive to evidence-based approaches: cognitive-behavioral therapy, interoceptive exposure, and somatic techniques have strong efficacy for the exact combination of mechanisms you are experiencing. Your nervous system is not broken; it is simply calibrated too high and has learned to misread safety signals, and these patterns can be recalibrated with consistent practice and professional support.
Overall result
Moderate panic disorderYour answers suggest signs compatible with a panic disorder of moderate intensity. Attacks occur occasionally and begin to influence certain behaviors — anxious anticipation, slight modifications of travel or activities. At this stage, the cycle characteristic of panic disorder — attack, anticipation, avoidance — is in the process of settling in without yet being fully structured. Clinical research indicates that this level of severity responds particularly well to early intervention. Recognized approaches, such as CBT, make it possible to interrupt this cycle before it generates more significant behavioral restrictions. This report is not a diagnosis, but these signs warrant attention and, if the symptoms persist, a consultation with a mental health professional.
Moderate panic disorder
4 dimensions to strengthen
4 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Regularity and recurrence of panic attacks.
Your answers suggest panic episodes of occasional occurrence, regular enough to warrant particular attention. At this level of moderate frequency, a phenomenon of gradual sensitization can settle in: each attack reinforces anticipatory vigilance, which itself increases the probability of a next attack.
This maintaining cycle is well documented in clinical approaches to panic disorder. Identifying specific triggers — contexts, internal states, life periods — is an essential first step to interrupt this dynamic. Tools drawn from CBT and neurovegetative regulation techniques can significantly reduce the frequency of episodes at this stage, before a more severe settling in.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Strength and severity of manifestations during an attack.
Your answers suggest attacks of high intensity, with physical symptoms — chest pain, choking, intense dizziness — and psychological ones — fear of dying, a sense of loss of control — that are very trying. At this level, the experience of the attack is memorized as traumatic, strongly reinforcing anxious anticipation and avoidance behaviors.
The brain wrongly interprets bodily sensations as signals of vital danger, which triggers a maximal physiological cascade. Recognized approaches, notably CBT and interoceptive exposure, are designed to work precisely on this mechanism of erroneous interpretation. Therapeutic support is clearly recommended to durably defuse this level of intensity.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Avoidance of places or situations where an attack might occur.
Your answers suggest partial avoidance of certain situations out of fear that a panic attack might occur there. This mechanism — moderate agoraphobic avoidance — is very common in panic disorder: it provides immediate relief, but gradually reinforces the belief that these situations are dangerous.
At this stage, mobility remains partially preserved, which constitutes an important therapeutic lever. Recognized approaches, such as CBT, show that gradual and controlled exposure to avoided situations, even slightly uncomfortable ones, makes it possible to break this cycle of avoidance before it further restricts your living space. Acting at this moderate level is particularly effective.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Excessive monitoring of physical sensations.
Your answers suggest significant bodily hypervigilance, constituting a central maintaining factor of your panic disorder. At this level, attention is almost constantly directed toward internal sensations — palpitations, breathing, dizziness, tension — in a posture of danger monitoring. This mechanism is paradoxical: the more attention concentrates on a sensation, the more it is amplified and perceived as intense, which in turn confirms the presence of a supposed danger.
This attentional cycle is precisely targeted by CBT for panic disorder, notably through interoceptive exposure and attentional retraining. These techniques make it possible to profoundly modify the relationship with bodily sensations. Specialized support is clearly indicated at this stage.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your high symptom intensity and high bodily hypervigilance create a particularly powerful feedback loop that likely maintains your panic disorder. When you experience a panic attack (intense physical and psychological symptoms), your attention snaps inward to monitor your body, searching for signs of danger — this hypervigilance to internal cues paradoxically amplifies the sensation of the symptoms themselves, making the attack feel more severe and longer-lasting than it might otherwise. This feeds a core fear: 'my symptoms are a sign something is very wrong,' which then triggers heightened monitoring on subsequent days, lowering your threshold for misinterpreting normal sensations as panic precursors.
Your moderate agoraphobia can be understood as a coping strategy in response to this intensity-hypervigilance loop — by avoiding situations where an attack might occur, you are attempting to reduce the likelihood of triggering the exhausting and distressing cycle. Conversely, avoidance strengthens hypervigilance by confirming the implicit belief that certain situations are dangerous. Breaking this cycle requires simultaneous work on tolerance for intense sensations, retraining of attention away from body-scanning, and gradual re-engagement with situations you have come to fear. The encouraging aspect of your profile is that all three of these targets are evidence-based components of standard panic disorder treatment, meaning that improvement in one area (e.g. learning to tolerate heart racing) naturally supports improvement in others (e.g. reduced hypervigilance, reduced avoidance).
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — sympathetic/mobilization oscillating towards dorsal/shutdown
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — Mind reading
Early schema — Vulnerability to Harm or Illness
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Anxiety and stress
Cognitive model of anxiety (Beck)
Sources: Beck, Emery & Greenberg (1985) ; Clark & Wells (1995)
Transactional model of stress (Lazarus)
Sources: Lazarus & Folkman (1984)
Intolerance of uncertainty
Sources: Dugas, Gagnon, Ladouceur & Freeston (1998)
Experiential avoidance
Sources: Hayes, Wilson, Gifford, Follette & Strosahl (1996)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Ellis's ABC model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Self-efficacy
Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Your panic profile tells the story of a finely tuned alarm system that has become too sensitive, too loud, and too hard to ignore. At its core, a cycle spins between two forces that reinforce each other: the raw power of your body's fear response and the near-constant scanning that feeds it. The high symptom intensity—racing heart, breathlessness, dizziness, a sense of unreality—arrives not as a distant rumble but as a bodily storm, even though attacks themselves are not a daily occurrence. This tells me that your nervous system has learned to mount an all-out defense when it senses a threat, as if the volume knob is stuck on high. Meanwhile, the bodily hypervigilance acts as a tripwire: you've become exquisitely attentive to internal shifts, a tight chest here, a skipped beat there. This vigilance is not a flaw; it's a skill, an attempt by your mind to catch danger early. The problem is that in a quiet body, this scanning still finds something, because bodies are always whispering. So a normal hitch in your heartbeat, once noticed, is interpreted through the lens of prior terrifying experiences, and the whole system fires. Attack frequency and agoraphobic avoidance sit at moderate levels not because the cycle is weak, but because you are actively managing it—perhaps by pushing through, by limiting life just enough to feel safe but not so much that things fall apart. The central organizer is this interplay: vigilance provides the kindling, and symptom intensity provides the blowtorch. The attacks aren't frequent because you've become skilled at steering clear of the edges, but the cost of that steering is a life lived with the brakes partially on.
This configuration creates a deep internal tension. On one side, it makes you remarkably attuned to your own body, capable of detecting subtle shifts that others miss. In some roles—caring for a child, noticing early signs of illness, responding to fast-changing environments—this can be a sharp advantage. You likely read rooms and moods quickly, because you read yourself so diligently. On the other side, this same gift is exhausting. You carry a quiet burden of surveillance, a background task that drains energy and narrows your bandwidth for spontaneity. What should be easy—like sitting in a meeting, driving over a bridge, or simply relaxing into sleep—becomes a negotiation with an internal threat detector. The moderate agoraphobia score suggests that while you are not housebound, you may silently map out safe and unsafe spaces, rehearsing escape routes or scanning for exits. So the tension is this: your vigilance protects you from being blindsided, but it also denies you the peace of being unguarded. The cost is the accumulation of stress, the missed opportunities for joy when you opt for the safe route, and the subtle message you send yourself that the world and your body cannot be trusted.
How did this equilibrium come to be? Understand that such patterns rarely appear out of nowhere; they often serve a purpose initially. Perhaps there was a time when being intensely alert to bodily signals and reacting powerfully was genuinely protective. For some, it follows a period of high stress, a health scare, a loss, or a history where control was taken away and the nervous system learned that the only safe place was deep inside the body. At 36, you've likely carried some version of this hyper-responsive style for a while. The moderate frequency of attacks suggests that the system serves to keep major eruptions at bay by maintaining a constant low-level alert. It's as if your psyche decided, "Better to stay a little afraid and in control than to be surprised by total chaos." This story is not about pathology; it's about adaptation. The panic cycle may have helped you navigate a demanding career, family responsibilities, or a period of uncertainty by ensuring you never let your guard down too far. It became a protector, albeit one that now oversteps its role, crying wolf at every internal rustle. Recognizing that this pattern once had a job to do can soften the frustration you might feel toward it.
In this profile, the most underappreciated resource is not the absence of frequent attacks but the moderation of agoraphobia. Your life has not yet been severely restricted. You are still engaging with the world, even if it costs you. That is a sign of deep-seated resilience and a will to not let fear write your boundaries. Many who score high on symptom intensity and hypervigilance have already begun retreating into very small lives. You haven't, and that is an enormous foundation to build on. Another resource lies precisely in your bodily hypervigilance. While it feeds panic now, this same capacity for interoception—sensing your internal state—can be transformed. It is the raw material for interoceptive mastery: learning to feel a shift without sentencing it to catastrophe. You have a sophisticated internal language; the next step is to become a fluent interpreter rather than a frightened listener. Finally, the intensity of your physical symptoms, paradoxically, means that your body is fully capable of returning to calm just as dramatically. A nervous system that can spike so high also has the capacity for deep, restorative rest—once it learns that the signal is safe.
What might shift first? The cycle is bidirectional, so you could intervene on either the vigilance or the intensity. However, the most accessible entry point often lies in lowering the hypervigilance just slightly, because that is where attention plays a role. You can't will your heart to stop racing during an attack, but you can practice not scanning for irregularities a hundred times a day. A concrete early sign of change might be this: you notice a mild bodily sensation—a flutter, a warmth, a twinge—and instead of the immediate thought "What is this? Is something wrong?", you notice it with a brief, neutral acknowledgment, like "Hm, a sensation," and your attention drifts on to something else in under ten seconds. This is not ignoring the body; it's trusting it to regulate without your conscious supervision. Over time, as this trusting becomes more habitual, the alarm threshold rises, and symptom intensity lowers because the brain receives fewer emergency calls from the watchtower. This first shift is less about eliminating panic and more about breaking the fusion between sensation and alarm. It's a small, almost invisible change, but it sends a message deep into the nervous system: "We don't have to panic every time the floor creaks." You have the self-awareness and the life context to begin this rewiring, and the moderate avoidance score suggests that while your world has shrunk a bit, it hasn't closed in; there is room to stretch back out, one gentle experiment at a time.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Attack Frequency
Symptom Intensity
Agoraphobia
Bodily Hypervigilance
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. I have episodes of intense fear that arise for no apparent reason.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. I have panic attacks at least once a month.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. My panic attacks also occur at night.
Answer : Rarely
4. The frequency of my attacks has increased in recent months.
Answer : Rarely
5. I have several attacks in the same week.
Answer : Rarely
6. I go through periods where attacks happen one after another over several days.
Answer : Rarely
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page